Webberweather53
Meteorologist
Well.. you know when China reports 57 cases that number is probably in the thousands again ?China reports 57 new cases.
Well.. you know when China reports 57 cases that number is probably in the thousands again ?China reports 57 new cases.
The test turn around though isn’t 24 hours, so the tests performed yesterday are not also the positives from yesterday. The positives we got yesterday are from the past 24-72 hours or more. Not saying what you are saying is wrong, but just can’t necessarily be extracted from the information. Yes, more tests overall will yield more positives, but more importantly, however regarding the above info is that yesterday only had 7772 tests, not 15834, the bigger number counts antibody tests, which is not testing for new cases.In GA, 1,018 new cases the last 24 hours. One might think that's a lot, especially for a Saturday, but the key is that there were a lot more tests vs yesterday. Also, hospital admissions, ICU and deaths were significantly lower than yesterday:
- 15,834 tests
- 1,018 cases
- 43 hospital admissions
- 8 ICU
- 28 deaths
Well.. you know when China reports 57 cases that number is probably in the thousands again ?
One of the interesting thoughts I heard on this was that as we are reopening, the higher risk individuals are still remaining mostly at home, therefore the spread has increased but mortality decreased, as more who are catching it are less likely to die. Still at this rate, the unknown of who dies and why (outside of the age/disease) group is still concerning....Diverging...parabolic rise in # of cases and # of deaths is inverse. ?
This is probably the best news we can get I would get...low mortality rate. ?
View attachment 42887
View attachment 42886
One of the interesting thoughts I heard on this was that as we are reopening, the higher risk individuals are still remaining mostly at home, therefore the spread has increased but mortality decreased, as more who are catching it are less likely to die. Still at this rate, the unknown of who dies and why (outside of the age/disease) group is still concerning....
The mortality rate is low... for now. When we run out of resources as the hospitals are continuously overloaded because certain people wanted to reopen everything prematurely, that will certainly change for the worse by a lotDiverging...parabolic rise in # of cases and # of deaths is inverse. ?
This is probably the best news we can get I would get...low mortality rate. ?
View attachment 42887
View attachment 42886
One thing I’d like to see is data on new hospitalizations for NC. Hospitalizations are relatively high now, but it’s unclear to me whether that is driven by longer stays or by an increased number of new admissions. Unfortunately, I don’t know if that data is available.Diverging...parabolic rise in # of cases and # of deaths is inverse. ?
This is probably the best news we can get I would get...low mortality rate. ?
View attachment 42887
View attachment 42886
The Alabama Department of Public Health’s June 14 10 a.m. numbers show 25,235 cases in the state, a jump of 1,014 since yesterday. The four-digit increase comes on the heels of three days where the number of new cases topped 800. The number of deaths from the virus stayed at 768.
According to ADPH, there are 540 hospitalizations from the virus, down from a high of 647 on June 11.
I’ve noticed in NC that hospitalizations often drop off significantly over the weekend, so it could be correct. I wouldn’t be surprised to see it spike again early this week, though (but hopefully not!).Deaths and hospitalizations look to continue to look down if this is correct. Although I’m not sure that isn’t a typo. That is a huge change in three days hospital wise.
I’ve noticed in NC that hospitalizations often drop off significantly over the weekend, so it could be correct. I wouldn’t be surprised to see it spike again early this week, though (but hopefully not!).