• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Misc 2018 Banter & Venting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I guess all of those that cashed out already won't be posting on the storm thread anymore. See ya next time then.
 
You had to know this was coming. To feel confident about a snow storm in nc you have to have the rain snow line at 72 hours near Augusta and the northern edge of qpf along i40. If the models are marginal at 72 hours its game over

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
Yup
4827adcec1ab775c09c55fcdd73682ab.gif


Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
I actually wish now this thing had of just cut and took all the heavy precip with it, I do not need another 1-2" of rain.... and I couldn't care less if I pick up an inch or 2 of sn/ip if it all gets washed away during the same storm by rain. Lol
 
Really in pretty good shape for this one. Should be able to net a foot if the 850 low will track exactly the way the euro has it. If it'll exit off central SC coast We would make a run past the 17-19 inch February 28, 2004. But within a stones throw to my NW 18-24+ not out of the question. A foot of snow with some sleet mixed in should , could hang on till Christmas hopefully.
 
noda-wx said:
lol Brick is asking for scientific data to back up why it won't snow. Dude has been on these boards for years and still can't read anything besides a snow map...but wants someone else to backup their claims with scientific data. That's rich. :D
Click to expand...
How do you know what I can and can't read? I want to hear why people think the models are wrong. But all I get is because climatology says that kind of storm is rare, and the models have been wrong before. I just don't get why you even come here to discuss the models if that is the attitude you have. People already have their minds made up the models have to be wrong, but for some reason still want to come look at what they show, and don't offer any other reason why the models are wrong. That's rich, and a little bit crazy.
 
Brick Tamland said:
How do you know what I can and can't read? I want to hear why people think the models are wrong. But all I get is because climatology says that kind of storm is rare, and the models have been wrong before. I just don't get why you even come here to discuss the models if that is the attitude you have. People already have their minds made up the models have to be wrong, but for some reason still want to come look at what they show, and don't offer any other reason why the models are wrong. That's rich, and a little bit crazy.
Click to expand...
To be fair Brick there has been a lot of information shared about the soundings (thermal profiles) and why they don't support the snow the maps are showing, it hasn't just been climo
 
Brick Tamland said:
How do you know what I can and can't read? I want to hear why people think the models are wrong. But all I get is because climatology says that kind of storm is rare, and the models have been wrong before. I just don't get why you even come here to discuss the models if that is the attitude you have. People already have their minds made up the models have to be wrong, but for some reason still want to come look at what they show, and don't offer any other reason why the models are wrong. That's rich, and a little bit crazy.
Click to expand...
In other words, if you don't think there will be maximum snow, then why talk about the weather. lol
 
please, go support your case in the storm thread as you've been asked. And there have been NUMEROUS reasons presented besides climatology on why this could be a bust.

It's easy to know what you can and can't read because all you do is copy and paste snow maps and other people's thoughts. Anytime anyone asks you to support anything you say scientifically you fold.

Please, prove me wrong and go reply in the storm thread with your scientific support of the 7" in Wake county. I'll gladly eat crow.
 
Brick Tamland said:
How do you know what I can and can't read? I want to hear why people think the models are wrong. But all I get is because climatology says that kind of storm is rare, and the models have been wrong before. I just don't get why you even come here to discuss the models if that is the attitude you have. People already have their minds made up the models have to be wrong, but for some reason still want to come look at what they show, and don't offer any other reason why the models are wrong. That's rich, and a little bit crazy.
Click to expand...
Brick, models are guidance. They are tools. You get mad because people say what you don't want to hear. Don't hate the player, hate the game.
 
metwannabe said:
To be fair Brick there has been a lot of information shared about the soundings (thermal profiles) and why they don't support the snow the maps are showing, it hasn't just been climo
Click to expand...
He knows this. But the standard response will be something like, but THIS TIME, they're consistent. Or, you guys are such debbie downers, why even talk about it. And then after it busts badly, "oh well, it's just snow. Part of the fun is hoping for snow."
 
Never fear guys and gals the Euro has a bowling ball traversing the SE at D9 and D10.....
 
WXinCanton said:
Brick, models are guidance. They are tools. You get mad because people say what you don't want to hear. Don't hate the player, hate the game.
Click to expand...
He knows. It's like trying to reason with a stump. I like Brick, but it's the same old schtick ever year.
 
metwannabe said:
Never fear guys and gals the Euro has a bowling ball traversing the SE at D9 and D10.....
Click to expand...
What are the temps like? Isn't that supposed to be when the big thaw is?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top