Because we want to maximize drought bittercasting.Question: Why are we looking at the simulated reflectivity of the NAM and using that for track?
Because we want to maximize drought bittercasting.Question: Why are we looking at the simulated reflectivity of the NAM and using that for track?
All models are especially sucky this winter. From chasing a few minor snow events, they make wild swings 1-2 days out almost every event! Long and short range modelsThe 12z NAM was much different than 6z. The 12z run is much faster and had precip farther west, but I'm not sure it'll be right. It is still making 200-300 mile shifts in 1 run and now takes the low to near Richmond VA, then back to south of the outer banks of NC before finally tracking northward going through eastern NY state and into Canada.
That is true. It makes it really hard to chase events. Hopefully things get better in January. Both RGEM and NAM are slowly bringing up totals in my neighborhood. Could get over .50" now.All models are especially sucky this winter. From chasing a few minor snow events, they make wild swings 1-2 days out almost every event! Long and short range models
Common bias since it’s “upgrade”. They over corrected the NAMI feel like the NAM is underdoing precip on the Western edge a bit.
Agreed… we’ve seen that with a number of tropical systems the last several yearsCommon bias since it’s “upgrade”. They over corrected the NAM
Looks in lock step with 0Z HRRR3k well west
More severe weather in the east and a dump of big totals for the western piedmont and foothillsLooks in lock step with 0Z HRRR