• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry 1/9-12 Winter Potential Great Dane or Yorkie

AFD from Memphis this afternoon. Going against the NAM sounds like:

The main headline for the forecast period is the expected winter
storm Friday. There is exceptional confidence in the progression
of the upper pattern into Friday at this range. A cutoff low over
the southwest CONUS will phase with a belt of strong upper flow to
its north tomorrow. These waves will then shear out, becoming an
amplified and positively tilted trough extending from Canada with
a base in northern Mexico. Flow on the lee side of the trough
will be strong (> 70 kt) and heavily diffluent and will aid in the
development of a surface low that will travel along the Gulf
Coast into this weekend. The high pressure currently sitting over
the Midsouth will hold cold air in place to the north of this
system. As the surface low approaches, moisture being drawn out
from over the gulf will isentropically lift over this cold air
mass and produce precipitation with support from the upper
diffluence starting Thursday night into Friday morning.

There still exists some ambiguity with respect to how
precipitation types will evolve during this event. The warm nose
has been consistently between 925 and 700 mb the past few days,
isothermal, and +/- 1 F around 32 F across much of the region.
Today, much of the guidance bifurcated with respect to the
strength and location of any frozen/liquid precipitation. Most
long-range guidance (ECMWF/GFS/GDPS) and HRRR/RAP/HREF keeps this
profile below freezing for much of the Friday as far south as
Clarksdale and Tupelo. However, NAM (12/3km respectively) bring
the rain/snow line up to the TN/MS border. As such, NBM brought a
mix up with the NAM as the higher resolution members don`t go out
as far. Opted to keep snow further south in line with medium/hi-
res guidance. Regardless, the depth of the near-surface cold
layer still appears to be shallow, which still allows for decent
confidence that this will be only a rain/snow event.

In terms of accumulations, the above uncertainties are reflected
in LREF/NBM probabilities. LREF brings a large swath of > 60%
chance of seeing 4 or more inches from a line between Clarksdale
and Tupelo up to the TN/KY border. This is in line with a
HRRR/RAP-like solution. On the other hand, the NBM has the same
chances only from the TN/MS border to TN/KY. However, the
probability of seeing 2 or more inches jumps to > 60% to across
northern MS, lending enough confidence that we think the entire
CWA will experience warning criteria with a widespread area of 4-6
inches across a large portion of the Midsouth. Some convective
mesoscale banding could also provide locally higher snowfall
amounts. The timing for accumulation is expected to start between
00z and 06z Friday, lasting until 00z Saturday in the eastern
portions of the region.

The system leaves by Saturday morning with drying weather behind
it. The highs/lows should remain cold, especially in areas that
see lasting snowpack after the storm ends. The current forecast
calls for lows to drop below 20 for multiple days into next week
across northern portions of the region and in the 20s across
Mississippi. A few showers or flurries are possible Monday with a
cold front, but otherwise high pressure appears likely to keep the
remainder of the forecast dry.
 
18z GFS
snku_acc-imp.us_se.png
 
RGEM keeps me all snow basically 3.4 inches. Ai euro shows about .4 qpf that I’m assuming is also all snow. That would match up pretty well imby. If that actually verifies, I get 3-4 inches and the rest of the dry as a bone runs are incorrect I’ll take that as a win. I will consult the euro ai only from now on and ignore all others lol.
 
The trend back up on the snowfall totals seems to be starting for those further north and to the east. Hopefully we continue to see that trend away from the warm nose for all. The purples are creeping back into the maps.
 
Like seeing the increase in snow output on subsequent runs of the GFS, though I know these snow maps are flawed. Curious to see if that can continue translating east. The best forcing is out west towards western Tennessee and Arkansas but I have seen QPF up in the 12-36hr time range multiple times in gulf lows like this. IMG_5839.gif
 
RGEM keeps me all snow basically 3.4 inches. Ai euro shows about .4 qpf that I’m assuming is also all snow. That would match up pretty well imby. If that actually verifies, I get 3-4 inches and the rest of the dry as a bone runs are incorrect I’ll take that as a win. I will consult the euro ai only from now on and ignore all others lol.

Even if you end up getting all sleet from that 0.4” QPF, you end up with 1-1.3” or so of sleet. 2” ish is probably realistic
 
I like the RGEM presentation for our region and want to wait until the HRDPS2.5km comes into range before making a guess about accumulation amounts. From GSO West, I think the vast majority of QPF will be snow with some sleet late. As you move East from there, I see some snow then sleet and ending as zr. Ga peeps are going to be a little snow sleet and a moderate amount of ZR. Extreme upstate SC will get a good front end thump of snow and end as some IP and zr, moving east from there will be ip. zr and a little snow. Alabama, Mississippi and a small part of NGa will see nice accumulations in there extreme North sections with a sharp cutoff not far away. The TN area and mountains (northern) of NC will have the best numbers for sn. A lot depends on the next 12-18 hours as we get more data from the short range high resolution models and a consensus of what to expect for individual areas,
 
If the GFS is to be believed... the problem layer for the upstate Friday evening is right at 700mb. Seems crazy high up warm nose for a weak'ish storm.

View attachment 161479
That sure isn't much of a 'warm nose'. Saturation is all the way up to 300 Mb, and a large DGZ looks more like a fatty sounding than IP to me.
 
RAP has our low up in the Smoky Mountains.


21z RAP at hr51:
View attachment 161484
So we have some with hardly enough precip and super weak low and the rap with an apps runner. I mean it’s a scenario but I highly doubt we see anything like this. Definitely wouldn’t put much in the RAP I believe it did well with a system or two over the years but definitely not at this range
 
The thing with the RAP is that it runs 24 times a day so you're going to get some weird solutions. It's also outside it's useful range, I'd argue.

Wow, the 18z UKMET looks pretty great to me. Big improvement on the 18z GFS for RDU peeps, too (though I'm glad to be in Orange County and not Wake).
 
Coming back to 850mb again...

These are kind of crude maps on SV, but the tell the story

The GFS is running a stronger 850mb low / wave from SW Louisiana into W North Carolina if you look at it closely. The Euro is running a weaker 850mb wave from SW Louisiana to south of Cape Hatteras (it's the west to east southern slider look). It's a big difference.

The GFS is going to bring more forcing for ascent (warm advection / overrunning and frontogenesis) - so more of the front end snow thump potential, but it's also bringing more of the warm nose aloft of course. Note also that there are other models that use the GFS boundary conditions (the HRRR for one from what I'm reading - not sure about the NAM and RAP - but those are NOAA / NCEP models)

Me, I would have more faith that the Euro has this correct, but not total faith. Say 60% Euro / 40% GFS

gYmlGtS.gif


ABlTZQh.gif
 
Back
Top