A little stronger and further SW, right? Tilt seems about the same.
Is that good or bad?TPV lifting to the NE as well on the Euro at 90
Is that good or bad?
Step in the right direction for sure, as expected. I still favor areas west of here. Assuming I'm wrong about that though, we're still going to need for this things to get going quickly off the coast of SC, as we'll be dealing with marginal temps.Just looking at models from last night...wow, I guess they were good. 6z EPS slp trend
View attachment 110112
Step in the right direction for sure, as expected. I still favor areas west of here. Assuming I'm wrong about that though, we're still going to need for this things to get going quickly off the coast of SC, as we'll be dealing with marginal temps.
My gut tells me that because of the trough orientation the system won't go negative far enough west to be an apps runner. I may be wrong. Even if it does come further west, as long as the system has enough time to develop and blossom, someone in the SE could get a wallop with dynamic cooling snow. It might be the Tennessee, Northern Mississippi, Northern Alabama region, or it could be the same area along the coast that received snow. Time will tell. At least we are in the game. It might be the last big opportunity this season.Personally I think we are shifting too far west too soon. Without any blocking and this thing digging further and further west there’s really not a lot from this thing going further inland IMO. We are on a thin thin line here between suppressed and OTS before turning into a bomb for the NE, potentially overrunning setup, and a potential Apps runner.
Personally I think we are shifting too far west too soon. Without any blocking and this thing digging further and further west there’s really not a lot from this thing going further inland IMO. We are on a thin thin line here between suppressed and OTS before turning into a bomb for the NE, potentially overrunning setup, and a potential Apps runner.
Or it can be an AL and N GA storm as well. Miller A style storms tend to be the best chance at big snows out this way as well and it shows on some ensemble members. Could also be a N GA through most of NC storm as well. Too many solutions with a lot of time to fluctuate 3 very key pieces of energy. The trends I say are in a fair position at the moment.My gut tells me that because of the trough orientation the system won't go negative far enough west to be an apps runner. I may be wrong. Even if it does come further west, as long as the system has enough time to develop and blossom, someone in the SE could get a wallop with dynamic cooling snow. It might be the Tennessee, Northern Mississippi, Northern Alabama region, or it could be the same area along the coast that received snow. Time will tell. At least we are in the game. It might be the last big opportunity this season.
Definitely. I think the goal posts are set. I hope that the storm develops fast enough for some folks in the SE to benefit. New England snow lovers have to be licking their chops though.Or it can be an AL and N GA storm as well. Miller A style storms tend to be the best chance at big snows out this way as well and it shows on some ensemble members. Could also be a N GA through most of NC storm as well. Too many solutions with a lot of time to fluctuate 3 very key pieces of energy. The trends I say are in a fair position at the moment.
That is the sticking point for me. While the trends are good and I would love to see a west track, on the other hand we are getting close to where the EPS isn’t off much.I don't see how the EPS is going to go from this cluster to running way inland. Once the EPS gets inside day 4 it's going to be in the ballpark of where the SLP will track.
View attachment 110113
The longwave trough configuration argues for a track east of the Apps (hopefully offshore please please please). We just need the PV to go on ahead and drop into the base of the trough and get it over with. ?Been thinking about how everyone wants the TPV to get going and I’m personally not a fan of routing for something like that for that exact reason .. I still think while there’s nothing backing the flow I don’t see much being able to really make this a “cutter” per say unless everything get going much earlier but I don’t see that in the cards yet
Sometimes I think people (not all just some) pull for buzzwords and acronyms with not much reasoning why they are or the end result of getting what they wantBeen thinking about how everyone wants the TPV to get going and I’m personally not a fan of routing for something like that for that exact reason .. I still think while there’s nothing backing the flow I don’t see much being able to really make this a “cutter” per say unless everything get going much earlier but I don’t see that in the cards yet
It won't take much to move it by a couple hundred miles or so. If the low was already formed and tracking along, then maybe a different story. I think people tend to forget a little bit how we're dealing with several pieces of ill-defined energy, the timing, orientation, strength, and combination of which can have significant impacts on where the storm forms, how strong it gets, and where it subsequently moves. There's no way the models have a precise lock on all of that. Being off by just a little can make the difference between an inland bomb or a swing and a miss even for New England.That is the sticking point for me. While the trends are good and I would love to see a west track, on the other hand we are getting close to where the EPS isn’t off much.
Notice the lesser press from tpv Sat. Good illustration of how close we are.
That actually looks pretty good to me. 80 miles SE and its a big one for NC.The 6z GFS was very close. It's going to be difficult for a lot of us but the MA/NE have to be drooling over a really big event.
View attachment 110116View attachment 110117
Going to push back a little on the bold, I think this energy is a little more defined and consistent than our usual 5-day-away storm. Agree with everything elseIt won't take much to move it by a couple hundred miles or so. If the low was already formed and tracking along, then maybe a different story. I think people tend to forget a little bit how we're dealing with several pieces of ill-defined energy, the timing, orientation, strength, and combination of which can have significant impacts on where the storm forms, how strong it gets, and where it subsequently moves. There's no way the models have a precise lock on all of that. Being off by just a little can make the difference between an inland bomb or a swing and a miss even for New England.
Tropospheric polar vortexGoing to push back a little on the bold, I think this energy is a little more defined and consistent than our usual 5-day-away storm. Agree with everything else
By the way i'm going to ask an amateur question, what is a TPV lol, I'm sure i know what it is just under different terminology
Take the 6z EPS ens cluster bullseye circle, move it 80 miles SE like you said and thats money, puts it right over Frying Pan Shoals. Thats the target for me and still leaves plenty of wiggle room futher west. The GEfs is almost there, probably 25 miles.That actually looks pretty good to me. 80 miles SE and its a big one for NC.
I’m guessing you mean SW?Take the 6z EPS ens cluster bullseye circle, move it 80 miles SE like you said and thats money, puts it right over Frying Pan Shoals. Thats the target for me and still leaves plenty of wiggle room futher west. The GEfs is almost there, probably 25 miles.
View attachment 110123
I’m probably the only one watching Texas/Oklahoma and seeing how they verify today too with their winter storm warnings. Radar looks better than a lot of guidance yesterday. Could bode well for eastern Carolina’s. View attachment 108746
Hopefully this means the southeast and not the northeast as they get enough snow compared to the south lol![]()
Someone in the East is going to get hammered
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk