• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Coronavirus (Stay on Topic)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Catfish said:
You complain about the thread being too political then you post a link to a story from The Atlantic? Hmmm.....
Click to expand...

Yes, because despite what you may think of the Atlantic, there are actual professionals speaking in this article. And if you don't want to read it, fine. But at least get educated on the matter. Maybe this will adhere to some of you:

www.npr.org

Prepare For Outbreaks Like New York's In Other States, Warns Anthony Fauci

A key adviser to the president, Dr. Anthony Fauci doesn't think every state needs to be on lockdown just yet. But some places should be preparing for surges like New York's.
www.npr.org www.npr.org
 
ryan1234 said:
For all of you downplaying this and there are a lot of you. Take 10 minutes and please read this article. None of us on here are damn doctors, so everything we are posting is hearsay. I need a break from this thread, honestly. When we first started it people were actually giving useful information. Now it's turned into a mostly political discussion with people "congratulating" Trump for his response. Which is asinine for so many reasons. Even if we had a different POTUS, I'd say the same thing.

www.theatlantic.com

How the Pandemic Will End

The U.S. may end up with the worst COVID-19 outbreak in the industrialized world. This is how it’s going to play out.
www.theatlantic.com www.theatlantic.com
Click to expand...
Don't take this the wrong way man but yeah, you might need a little break. Stay safe.....
 
Since we haven't tested all 300 million americans, the governers of "most states" are taking the advice of the Trump administration and treating their response to the worse case scenario even without the testing data. That's actually the correct thing to do. Yes some will disagree for obvious reasons but its the best response with the least amount of "overkill".....
 
According to BNO we are about 387 cases away from overtaking China as the most coronavirus cases.
 
And Italy has a population density that's five times that of the U.S.... five times as many people on top of each other helping the virus spread. Where has US seen greatest issues? NYC? What city has the highest population density in the U.S.? There's a correlation in my opinion... rural NC and other vast parts of this country don't have anywhere close to that level of population density. Let the large metropolitan areas take the necessary precautions to protect their citizens, while other rural counties do what they see fit. Just my $.02...
 
Uncwmark said:
And Italy has a population density that's five times that of the U.S.... five times as many people on top of each other helping the virus spread. Where has US seen greatest issues? NYC? What city has the highest population density in the U.S.? There's a correlation in my opinion... rural NC and other vast parts of this country don't have anywhere close to that level of population density. Let the large metropolitan areas take the necessary precautions to protect their citizens, while other rural counties do what they see fit. Just my $.02...
Click to expand...
New York City has a densely concentrated population and it is a major international hub. Those are both factors.
 
Letting local leaders take the lead on public safety decisions works most of the time. Most disasters tend to have localized impacts.

This is affecting us nationwide. Our response should be led more at the federal level than by governors.

It's like if Governor Cooper had decided not to close schools across NC last week, but decided instead to let the local school systems make that decision, how would that look like? Do we praise him for leadership and assume local leaders are following his advice, or would we think he's timid and a step behind on what should have been done? If I recall, he got a little bit of heat on here for waiting until the largest systems make the call before he pulled the trigger.

Most of the time, letting school systems make the call to close schools works because it's due to weather, and storms affect different parts of the state differently. Most would believe this situation was different because of the unique circumstances and required a statewide decision. If so, why would this apply to the state level, but not the federal?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top