• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Misc 2019 Banter & Friendly Conservation

GeorgiaGirl said:
I've talked a fair bit about it, everybody is going to bust on their winter prediction this go around, in fact, the main thing I held hope in was perhaps having a good February again from the start. Now that's not going to happen, and I've done some lurking on the other board and there was one guy (Bob Chill?) that said that if we had based our long range forecasts off how the tropics looked, outside of one area (yeah, my memory is bad so I forgot about the area), it basically didn't look like what you'd expect from a Nino, and it would have potentially led to a different forecast.

So the one thing this semi informed poster is going to wonder about is if persistence forecasting might be the real way to go instead of taking if it's going to be a Nino or Nina and using even recent analogs to base off what the forecast will be.

Ultimately even if you do very well with forecasting in the long range: "Mother Nature is going to do what she will".

The February thread next year shouldn't be "Fab February", it should be "Make Februaries Great Again" (or that should be posted in the subtitle).
Click to expand...
How about being a bit more expansive and subtitling all the threads "Make Winter Great Again"?

I'll buy the hats ...
 
1300m said:
Screw you douchebag. What a low life. Where's one valuable post you've ever made to this forum. This right here is why I'm no longer posting. And all the mods are liars saying they don't allow this BS.
Click to expand...
Lol maybe we weren't on and just now reading posts? You know this is just a message board not a job

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
SD said:
Lol maybe we weren't on and just now reading posts? You know this is just a message board not a job

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Thanks for the clarification. I'm glad there haven't been 10+ other posters seeing the same thing and complaining since I last posted.
 
Myfrotho704_ said:
I hate to say it, I really do but I think this thread got to go, and that’s coming from a person who complains a lot lol
Click to expand...
This is exactly the kind of blatant cheap shots that have been occurring since the inception of this thread that both myself and Jon have been told weren't actually happening.
 
1300m said:
This is exactly the kind of blatant cheap shots that have been occurring since the inception of this thread that both myself and Jon have been told weren't actually happening.
Click to expand...
Yet neither of you have taken the time to actually point out specific examples until now. Why?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
SD said:
Seems you have a lot of issues with our moderation today.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
No, just that one
 
1300m said:
Screw you douchebag. What a low life. Where's one valuable post you've ever made to this forum. This right here is why I'm no longer posting. And all the mods are liars saying they don't allow this BS.
Click to expand...
I'm sorry that you feel this way. I let that post go because I didn't deem it a personal attack. If you would have reported it or sent one of us a private message, we could have discussed it further. Personally, if we are going to let a post go through that questions the pattern that JB promised, I don't see much difference if 1300 is substituted in for JB.

Please send me a private message. I, for one, miss your insightful posts about the weather. If I can do anything to remedy this, please let me know. We are doing the best we can.
 
I got pats 28-20.... patriots defensive line will pressure goff all day, when he is pressured there offense is ----
 
Even though I’ve posted in it some with some silliness, myself, I wouldn’t be upset if this thread were terminated. If it is really leading to the creation of cliques and although it has its positives (like allowing venting), I think the negatives would be more significant than the positives. But if it stays, it stays. And unfortunately, cliques are sort of a bad side of human nature. They’re very hard to avoid. The growth in membership makes it harder to prevent them I think.
 
packfan98 said:
I'm sorry that you feel this way. I let that post go because I didn't deem it a personal attack. If you would have reported it or sent one of us a private message, we could have discussed it further. Personally, if we are going to let a post go through that questions the pattern that JB promised, I don't see much difference if 1300 is substituted in for JB.

Please send me a private message. I, for one, miss your insightful posts about the weather. If I can do anything to remedy this, please let me know. We are doing the best we can.
Click to expand...

Yeah, helped me learn things aswell
 
packfan98 said:
I'm sorry that you feel this way. I let that post go because I didn't deem it a personal attack. If you would have reported it or sent one of us a private message, we could have discussed it further. Personally, if we are going to let a post go through that questions the pattern that JB promised, I don't see much difference if 1300 is substituted in for JB.

Please send me a private message. I, for one, miss your insightful posts about the weather. If I can do anything to remedy this, please let me know. We are doing the best we can.
Click to expand...
Great slam!
 
GaWx said:
Even though I’ve posted in it some with some silliness, myself, I wouldn’t be upset if this thread were terminated. If it is really leading to the creation of cliques and although it has its positives (like allowing venting), I think the negatives would be more significant than the positives. But if it stays, it stays. And unfortunately, cliques are sort of a bad side of human nature. They’re very hard to avoid. The growth in membership makes it harder to prevent them I think.
Click to expand...
If only IMBY were not the focus. The most overused word in the English language is "I" ... :cool:
... followed by "me" and "mine" ...
 
SD said:
Yet neither of you have taken the time to actually point out specific examples until now. Why?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
That’s kinda missing the point with all due respect. I wanted to only speak in general terms. I don’t run to mods in PM with posts asking folks to be moderated. I was just noticing a trend and decided to bring it up, multiple times.

We’ve been told mods are working in the background and have a list of repeat offenders, if that’s not the case and you need our help id say let me know, but I don’t really care anymore to be honest. But just like today, it’s a problem and it’s here to stay.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Uh oh...26CBD90F-FD57-4CCE-862E-6B3F4591E2EA.png
 
GaWx said:
Even though I’ve posted in it some with some silliness, myself, I wouldn’t be upset if this thread were terminated. If it is really leading to the creation of cliques and although it has its positives (like allowing venting), I think the negatives would be more significant than the positives. But if it stays, it stays. And unfortunately, cliques are sort of a bad side of human nature. They’re very hard to avoid. The growth in membership makes it harder to prevent them I think.
Click to expand...

I’m actually fine with it staying. I know I’ve said get rid of it in the past, but the people calling members by name need to be moderated. Muted for a while, short term ban, whatever. It’s just not the place for it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Feb 19th, a few tweaks..C5D49223-CBBC-4C7E-8B31-305C54608F4F.png
 
packfan98 said:
Not to me. I've been following JB for over 15 years. He's one of the best pattern recognition mets that we've ever had.
Click to expand...
Yet a visitor to this site would think @Snowflowxxl is a more respected meteorologist than he is. Can no one see the problem with this?
 
Jon said:
I’m actually fine with it staying. I know I’ve said get rid of it in the past, but the people calling members by name need to be moderated. Muted for a while, short term ban, whatever. It’s just not the place for it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
I agree, let it stay. It's shown the true colors of 90% of posters on the board and has certainly made my decision on whether to contribute or not extremely easy.
 
1300m said:
I agree, let it stay. It's shown the true colors of 90% of posters on the board and has certainly made my decision on whether to contribute or not extremely easy.
Click to expand...

I was actually right when I said “it was this thread” a few days ago for the reason you’ve been off lol, just remembered that
 
1300m said:
I agree, let it stay. It's shown the true colors of 90% of posters on the board and has certainly made my decision on whether to contribute or not extremely easy.
Click to expand...

I hope you keep posting. We have very few pro mets that post and your knowledge and insights make you a valuable poster. I know it isn't easy but try not to let individual posts get to you too much. Even we have our differences of opinion on the crucialness of a -NAO for SE winter storms and it even got heated for a very short time (and it was entertaining to some), but we got by that and sort of let it go at least for now, and neither of us stooped down to name calling or anything juvenile. I thought we kept it pretty classy as we kept it as robust discussion/debating (and it was quite robust).
 
GaWx said:
Even though I’ve posted in it some with some silliness, myself, I wouldn’t be upset if this thread were terminated. If it is really leading to the creation of cliques and although it has its positives (like allowing venting), I think the negatives would be more significant than the positives. But if it stays, it stays. And unfortunately, cliques are sort of a bad side of human nature. They’re very hard to avoid. The growth in membership makes it harder to prevent them I think.
Click to expand...

I feel the same way. The thread was made mainly because of two posters who are obvious trolls but are still allowed to post. Why not just get rid of the trolls and keep the banter thread like it was?
 
Brick Tamland said:
Just a thought, but I don't think we really have any idea what is going to happen


I feel the same way. The thread was made because of really two posters who are obvious trolls but are still allowed to post.
Click to expand...

Everyone serves a purpose just like you. This thread serves a purpose. No one is forced to come here and read and post. Like you have side the ignore button is here for a reason.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
GaWx said:
I hope you keep posting. We have very few pro mets that post and your knowledge and insights make you a valuable poster. I know it isn't easy but try not to let individual posts get to you too much. Even we have our differences of opinion on the crucialness of a -NAO for SE winter storms and it even got heated for a very short time (and it was entertaining to some), but we got by that and sort of let it go at least for now, and neither of us stooped down to name calling or anything juvenile. I thought we kept it pretty classy as we kept it as robust discussion/debating (and it was quite robust).
Click to expand...

I agree. The problem is a couple of posters who troll and mainly post sarcastic and snarky posts. Even if they don't call posters out you can tell who the posts are talking about
 
NoSnowATL said:
Everyone serves a purpose just like you. This thread serves a purpose. No one is forced to come here and read and post. Like you have side the ignore button is here for a reason.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

But obvious mocking, snark, and general mean spiritedness should not be allowed.
 
GaWx said:
I hope you keep posting. We have very few pro mets that post and your knowledge and insights make you a valuable poster. I know it isn't easy but try not to let individual posts get to you too much. Even we have our differences of opinion on the crucialness of a -NAO for SE winter storms and it even got heated for a very short time (and it was entertaining to some), but we got by that and sort of let it go at least for now, and neither of us stooped down to name calling or anything juvenile. I thought we kept it pretty classy as we kept it as robust discussion/debating (and it was quite robust).
Click to expand...
I think RC pointed it out but that is how to make two opposing arguments and do so respectfully. I enjoyed the discourse honestly, and it makes me better when I have to defend my position. Heck, politicians could learn a thing or ten from our debate lol. Thanks again for the kind words and no hard feelings at all on my end. I respect your contributions and think you are one of the most unique posters on the board. Keep it up!
 
With the posters here, admittedly including me, we're not going to have this forum ever become similar to what eastern was, where then 13 year old me off of vague memories saw it as a forum where the more informative posters, mets or otherwise dominated the conversation and the people more on the hobbyist level or even lower were more lurkers than posters. So I'd let it go...admittedly folks like Chris (even Larry and a few others?) are used to us folks though from previous history online.

I can't lie though, older me appreciates the idea of that board. It was the mecca of weather forums around then because of how it naturally went. Just don't think we can bring that kind of a feel back though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top