I hate the targeting rule. It really gives the officials the power to eject any defensive player at any given time. I’m not a Clemson fan. I just don’t like it
I hate the targeting rule. It really gives the officials the power to eject any defensive player at any given time. I’m not a Clemson fan. I just don’t like it
Brent, I need you in on this action. Some of my best storms started in your back yard. Reel it in for me
Brent, I need you in on this action. Some of my best storms started in your back yard. Reel it in for me
Bet you won’t say names ??Can’t wait to watch the people that punted next week try and back their way into the THREATS , meaning more than one . It’s gonna happen and I might ban them for a week
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bet you won’t say names
I honestly think it should be for early next weeks threat.. it is clear what we’re looking at here... either a big time storm for many or a sur pressed wave of arctic air ... this is clear STORM POTENTIAL so I would believe it would warrant its own thread where we track whether or not we get that phase or not .. it’s also inside 200 hours so like let’s pull the trigger?
cause a thread doesn’t guarantee there will be a storm right? Just that we are tracking the storm potential and I think we the storm would look like if it were to materialize
hey, if they won't allow me to start a *record Jan warm event thread, then there should be some general agreement among models a storm is forming before said thread is allowed. :
Yep we are all going to die slowly as we combust from the inside. We get it, you dont have to post about it 50000000 times. ThanksIt’s the new normal now. It’s like making a thread for a rain storm.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk