Welllll ----
NAM is just coming back to reality and aligning with the other models. When the NAM went north and nothing joined it that was a big red flag that it was over amplified. If any other model on earth had gone as far north and wet as the NAM it would have been slightly more believable.The 12z NAM backed down a bit vs. the 06z. Toss.
It's nowcast time, so now we throw away all the models that don't give us as much snow as we want we have lived and died by for days and instead look at radar hallucinations.
It still might be, who knows. We can still hope for the last minute NW trend, or that precip overperforms as it often has this winter with our plentiful rainstorms. The Gulf and Atlantic must be locked and losses with plenty of energy considering how warm it's been (granted, models already take this into account).I am the same way. Not thrilled by the latest NAM. Looks like a 2 to 4 event for most folks. I really thought up this way it would be more around 6. Better than nothing, though.
If it were currently 21 and not 41 we could easily pull off 6+I am the same way. Not thrilled by the latest NAM. Looks like a 2 to 4 event for most folks. I really thought up this way it would be more around 6. Better than nothing, though.
I'm not surprised. The NWS knows what they're doing. Always go with them. They pretty much said non event by not issuing an advisory yesterday.Welllll ----
I will say the NAM led the way with the initial north jaunt when most other modeling was really flat and OTS, though, so at least it proved to be of some value. It seems it has played into its biases in the shorter range, though. Granted, I think we all knew those widespread 12"+ totals were just the NAM being the NAM.NAM is just coming back to reality and aligning with the other models. When the NAM went north and nothing joined it that was a big red flag that it was over amplified. If any other model on earth had gone as far north and wet as the NAM it would have been slightly more believable.
I mean they didn't do so hot last time around, that's why I had doubts. I still think we'll see snow todayI'm not surprised. The NWS knows what they're doing. Always go with them. They pretty much said non event by not issuing an advisory yesterday.
Maybe weenies will quit bashing the NWS after this. They know way more than us.Starting to make sense why a wstorm watch wasnt issued for rdu area
I think what happens is that expectations get set high by bullish talk and pretty snow maps. The conservative point of view tends to be cast aside as debbie downer talk.I am the same way. Not thrilled by the latest NAM. Looks like a 2 to 4 event for most folks. I really thought up this way it would be more around 6. Better than nothing, though.
Flakes may fly but any accumulation is unlikely now.I mean they didn't do so hot last time around, that's why I had doubts. I still think we'll see snow today
@Jimmy Hypocracy would love this if it came true...LOL!
About what we got a couple of weeks ago. Maybe if we are lucky. As far as getting over 1-2 inches of snow here in upstate SC it may be 10+ years before it happens again. We will not get an event like Jan 1988 in any of our lifetimes. Events like that are gone forever for this entire board.I mean they didn't do so hot last time around, that's why I had doubts. I still think we'll see snow today
I'm at least 100% sure that's wrongAbout what we got a couple of weeks ago. Maybe if we are lucky. As far as getting over 1-2 inches of snow here in upstate SC it may be 10+ years before it happens again. We will not get an event like Jan 1988 in any of our lifetimes. Events like that are gone forever for this entire board.
Thanks for letting us know for the 3rd time in 24 hours.About what we got a couple of weeks ago. Maybe if we are lucky. As far as getting over 1-2 inches of snow here in upstate SC it may be 10+ years before it happens again. We will not get an event like Jan 1988 in any of our lifetimes. Events like that are gone forever for this entire board.