• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Misc Winter Whamby 2020, a New Decade

Status
Not open for further replies.
LoganElliott40 said:
Better than all the Mets forecasts!!
Click to expand...

I would tell you to stop with this nonsense, but you're an obvious troll.

Farmer's almanac forecasts can't verified against reality because they never put any actual numbers or figures w/ their temp or precipitation outlooks, they're not conducted by actual, legitimate, & honest scientists they have a "black box" approach that apparently " relies on sunspot activity, tidal action, planetary position and many other factors." none of which have been shown to have any significance in literature or verifiable reality in influencing daily weather, they also produce the most overgeneralized statements in their outlooks s.t. they are more likely to verify if extreme warmth or cold is realized, when they actually attempt to make a forecast, they bust... hard. You don't have to go back very far to find an example of this:
"The 2014 (Farmer's Almanac) Winter Outlook,[9] which called for a winter storm to hit just about the time Super Bowl XLVIII was to be played at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey (no such storm materialized, and the weather was actually warmer than average at the time of the event)."

To top if off, you're trying to prove their legitimacy to me by showing a February forecast that hasn't even verified yet.

You might want to go back into the corner and pick up that coloring book you dropped on the ground.
 
Webberweather53 said:
I would tell you to stop with this nonsense, but you're an obvious troll.

Farmer's almanac forecasts can't verified against reality because they never put any actual numbers or figures w/ their temp or precipitation outlooks, they're not conducted by actual, legitimate, & honest scientists they have a "black box" approach that apparently " relies on sunspot activity, tidal action, planetary position and many other factors." none of which have been shown to have any significance in literature or verifiable reality in influencing daily weather, they also produce the most overgeneralized statements in their outlooks s.t. they are more likely to verify if extreme warmth or cold is realized, when they actually attempt to make a forecast, they bust... hard. You don't have to go back very far to find an example of this:
"The 2014 (Farmer's Almanac) Winter Outlook,[9] which called for a winter storm to hit just about the time Super Bowl XLVIII was to be played at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey (no such storm materialized, and the weather was actually warmer than average at the time of the event)."

To top if off, you're trying to prove their legitimacy to me by showing a February forecast that hasn't even verified yet.

You might want to go back into the corner and pick up that coloring book you dropped on the ground.
Click to expand...
Mods please move this garbage out of here. Stay focused people....
 
Somosdel said:
Mods please move this garbage out of here. Stay focused people....
Click to expand...

Maybe you should actually tell this to the troll who's been incessantly posting one-liner responses about how good the unverifiable Farmer's Almanac outlooks are instead of whining at an actual meteorologist who knows what they're talking about
 
Folks,
No one is happy with the weather and the forecast and the models (well, all but maybe a couple aren't); regardless, it's not cause for constant whining, bitching and most importantly throwing darts at other posters.
I get rain twice this week, and that will wash the pollen out. Now pollen in January ... a reason to have issues, but find a bright side, or perhaps take an afternoon off.
Best,
Phil
 
Needless to say...I don't come on here to act like how I do sometimes with sports 95% of the time or to see people acting like that...lol. Only time I used to do things like that...was when I was a 13-15 year old.
 
Jon said:
ATL still recorded at least a trace during that span
04-05: 0.5”
05-06: T”
06-07: 0.1”
07-08: 1.4”

ATL hasn’t gone 2 years without at least a trace of snow since before the period of record which is 1931. If ATL remains snowless this year, that record will be broken.

The last time ATL was snowless before last year was 1936-37



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
You're right I didn't use the site to go back and double check on those like I should have. I was going off memory, I remember us getting back to back snow in January 2008 in a one week period, the only highlight of that winter. I mostly blocked out 2005-2007 except for the ice storm we had in January 2005. Those years were a complete dumpster fire clusterf----. We might not have a snowfall average as high as some of the members here or get the big dogs, but we don't usually go long stretches w/o measurable snow so if we miss out this year 2020-21 may be more promising.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jon
giphy.gif



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Been raining for a few hours no sleet from the start or anything wintry.. Then my wife calls and says SLEET is hitting my windshield, I said no way! So i put my trusty Eddie Bauer puffy coat on and went outside (works good for checking weather) and sure nuff sleet was mixing in with the RAIN COLD................. So I got my 10-15 pellets of sleet. #winning #awesome #winter
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top