• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Presidential Election 2024

Then go to some alt right circle jerk site and have fun in an echo chamber.
Then proceed too, (some other WX forum), too be with YOUR Folks & Echo chamber, aka Blue Hive..
Meanwhile, We experience FREEDOM & Public Discourse HERE, AND the First Amendment..
You ARE allowed to express your views Here, though, you might not find Folks that agree with you..
Or your opinions..

BUT..
WE DO NOT BAN~hammer folks for the *Opposite* view points.. Just Sayin

(thank you Mods)..
 
Facts & Math..

One common refrain: They're inflationary.

That's a lie and any economist who says that knows he or she is lying.

This is math, not politics.

Let's definite this: A tariff is a tax on an imported good or service. It thus does indeed raise the price of said good or service by the amount of the tariff. This is easily understood and weaponized by the liars in the media and economic profession. The media may not know the facts but all economists do.

In fact a tariff is exactly neutral to inflation as a whole.

Why?

Let's take an example.

There is a thing that has a price of $1,000 at the dock coming into the US. The US Government slaps a $1,000 tariff (100%) on it, so now the cost at the dock is $2,000. Assuming the business passes that through and neither attempts to profit from or absorb it, that is, they take no deliberate action to attempt to exploit it or be damaged by it, the entire $1,000 shows up on the shelf price.

That sounds inflationary.

It isn't.

Why not?

Because all inflation is caused by the emission of credit, and the US Government is running a fiscal deficit -- that is, emitting credit. This is the infamous (and true) Milton Friedman statement: "Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomena."

So where does the $1,000 go?

It goes directly to the Federal Government and reduces inflation generated by the federal government by the exact same amount the price increase at the consumer increases it.


CNBC is lying to you -- and the Press (MSN), is about to do it too with their "questions" for Powell.

Again: Tariffs are a zero when it comes to inflation -- they neither help or hurt it as a function of imposing and collecting them because there is exact balance, to the penny, of both inflationary and deflationary forces.

HOWEVER, to the extent a tariff incentivizes jobs and production to come back to the United States they are deflationary and benefit consumers by lowering inflation pressure in that producing a good or service in the United States instead of overseas means all of the tax revenue generated by the activity happens here in the United States and tax revenue of course decreases the deficit and thus drives inflation down.
 
Folks they are not going to honor the mandate made by you, the American people. They will continue to cater to the ultra-left constituents further alienating the majority in this country.
 
Facts & Math..

One common refrain: They're inflationary.

That's a lie and any economist who says that knows he or she is lying.

This is math, not politics.

Let's definite this: A tariff is a tax on an imported good or service. It thus does indeed raise the price of said good or service by the amount of the tariff. This is easily understood and weaponized by the liars in the media and economic profession. The media may not know the facts but all economists do.

In fact a tariff is exactly neutral to inflation as a whole.

Why?

Let's take an example.

There is a thing that has a price of $1,000 at the dock coming into the US. The US Government slaps a $1,000 tariff (100%) on it, so now the cost at the dock is $2,000. Assuming the business passes that through and neither attempts to profit from or absorb it, that is, they take no deliberate action to attempt to exploit it or be damaged by it, the entire $1,000 shows up on the shelf price.

That sounds inflationary.

It isn't.

Why not?

Because all inflation is caused by the emission of credit, and the US Government is running a fiscal deficit -- that is, emitting credit. This is the infamous (and true) Milton Friedman statement: "Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomena."

So where does the $1,000 go?

It goes directly to the Federal Government and reduces inflation generated by the federal government by the exact same amount the price increase at the consumer increases it.


CNBC is lying to you -- and the Press (MSN), is about to do it too with their "questions" for Powell.

Again: Tariffs are a zero when it comes to inflation -- they neither help or hurt it as a function of imposing and collecting them because there is exact balance, to the penny, of both inflationary and deflationary forces.

HOWEVER, to the extent a tariff incentivizes jobs and production to come back to the United States they are deflationary and benefit consumers by lowering inflation pressure in that producing a good or service in the United States instead of overseas means all of the tax revenue generated by the activity happens here in the United States and tax revenue of course decreases the deficit and thus drives inflation down.
Real economist have a different point of view on this.
 
You know it wouldn't be so bad if y'all just weren't so fake about all of it y'all pretend to love the Constitution y'all are full of it y'all don't. Bham says use common sense instead of the Constitution I mean what sense does that make if that's how y'all really feel then there's no reason why the Democrats can't use common sense and fix gun laws but the Constitution prevents that.

Just man up and say you don't care about the Constitution unless it works in your favor that's all y'all have to say

Now do the 1st and 2nd Amendments...
 
Everybody gets banned from American if you express the wrong political views.

I haven't been banned, but I've been thoroughly ostracized and even "5-posted" on their off-shoot political forum (I think they've shut it down and come back over to American).

They will occasionally mention my name to bait me into replying, but I don't bother.
 
Jim Clyburn, a deep blue lifelong politician in my state said that he was concerned about how many people in his district were asking how to do a split vote because they wanted to vote for Trump as president.

A large number of Democrat and Independent voters went for Trump as president. The ones against Trump and who push division, still, are now the minority.
South Carolina definitely had a higher vote for Republicans than in 2020 when I looked at the numbers.
 
Jim Clyburn, a deep blue lifelong politician in my state said that he was concerned about how many people in his district were asking how to do a split vote because they wanted to vote for Trump as president.

A large number of Democrat and Independent voters went for Trump as president. The ones against Trump and who push division, still, are now the minority.

You can thank Jim Clyburn for Trump's 2nd term, BTW.

His endorsement of Biden in the 2020 primary is what changed everything at that time.
 
Back
Top