D
Deleted member 527
Guest
Hallelujah!
Who on earth would apply or be willing to do such a job. I guarantee you some of these workers would get shot. Because they have no means of protection for themselves.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This isn’t those countries though
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lol I know some reps over in London. They say it’s a crap show. Most have no guns and cameras everywhere. They have no privacy. Also they have plenty of crime. It more of a communist living there. Totally different living there than here. They don’t have the freedoms we have. If it’s so great in these other countries why are some staying in the US? Why so many want to move to America? This fella eyes are open and realize the younger generation will bend over without even thinking.Plenty of countries operate without armed traffic cops and don’t have lawlessness. Open your eyes fella, there’s a whole world out there that does things the right way and we can learn a lot from them!
90% of London’s police force don’t carry weapons...and when the other 10% respond to crimes with weapons, the outcome is significantly different.
“The Metropolitan Police carried out some 3,300 deployments involving firearms in 2016. They didn't fire a single shot at a suspect.
It's a world away from the United States, where cops killed 1,092 people in 2016, according to figures compiled by The Guardian.”
I say this and ask you, do you think London is a place of absolute lawlessness with a bunch of imposters and rape?
They don’t have guns over there like here. We can’t compare true numbers.Police deaths aren’t any higher in the counties that restrict weapons on police than they are in the USA.
Police deaths in New York and London during the twentieth century
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
“During the 20th century, 585 police officers in New York and 160 police officers in London died while participating in law enforcement activities.
New York had markedly higher intentional police mortality rates compared to London throughout most of the 20th century.
Intentional gunshot wounds comprised 290 police deaths in New York, but only 14 police deaths in London.
In New York, gunshot wounds (intentional and unintentional) accounted for more occupational police deaths (51.6%) than did all other mechanisms combined.
In London, motor vehicle collision was the most common cause (47.5%) of occupational police death.
There were no correlations between the general population homicide rates and intentional police mortality rates in either New York or London.”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This isn’t those countries? What do you mean by that?
Bingo x 100What happens when you stop someone with felony warrants in multiple states. Maybe you pull over a car for an expired tag who is trafficking drugs, minors, .....
They don’t have guns over there like here. We can’t compare true numbers.
To all those that think this is a great idea. Then join this force. Good luck!
Have you not been paying attention. Shooting and crime has escalated in this country and riots continue. This is a dangerous idea here. We absolutely must have cops with guns here
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So we would have unarmed people of authority pulling people over?I’ve been paying attention — your post was without context and made no freaking sense. So we aren’t like other countries in the setting of gun violence, well hell thats definitely something we can agree on there! A no brainer!
We can have police with guns. Our police force can be re-designed to approach certain calls differently and it can be more effective with less senseless killings. Why are we stuck on not even brainstorming any change at all?
Yes that's all good until they pull over a gangster that pulls a gun.Traffic violations shouldn’t require armed police. Look at other westernized countries. Our idea of policing is flawed.
I’ve been paying attention — your post was without context and made no freaking sense. So we aren’t like other countries in the setting of gun violence, well hell thats definitely something we can agree on there! A no brainer!
We can have police with guns. Our police force can be re-designed to approach certain calls differently and it can be more effective with less senseless killings. Why are we stuck on not even brainstorming any change at all?
Police do a great good overall. Yes a few times it’s not so great. Some doctors suck as well.I agree with most that. My only concern as someone else said what happens when a known felon is pulled over and hits shoots the person that pulled him over. That person dead and never had a chance because he had no gun. We should absolutely brainstorm how to train law enforcement to use appropriate force vs George Floyd situations. But disarming police isn’t the answer.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Understood but you wouldnt think a call to wake up a drunk in the drive through at wendy's would end up with 2 cops wrestling the drunk for a tazer, one cop being knocked to the ground concussed, the other being shot at before the drunk was unfortunately killed. Just last year a routine stop in downtown Raleigh led to an RPD officer being shot in the face at point blank range. You are unfortunately living in a mean society........I’ve been paying attention — your post was without context and made no freaking sense. So we aren’t like other countries in the setting of gun violence, well hell thats definitely something we can agree on there! A no brainer!
We can have police with guns. Our police force can be re-designed to approach certain calls differently and it can be more effective with less senseless killings. Why are we stuck on not even brainstorming any change at all?
I’ve been paying attention — your post was without context and made no freaking sense. So we aren’t like other countries in the setting of gun violence, well hell thats definitely something we can agree on there! A no brainer!
We can have police with guns. Our police force can be re-designed to approach certain calls differently and it can be more effective with less senseless killings. Why are we stuck on not even brainstorming any change at all?
Jon I agree gun violence sucks. I was raised around guns and taught at an early age about them. My kids also. I think kids need to learn education of guns early in age. I do believe gun laws need to be more strict in some ways but banning them I’m totally against. The majority of individuals that have guns respect everyone. Do you own any guns Jon? What is your thinking on having guns and gun laws?Good luck to you too. Just sharing opinions here, don’t be so dismissive and have a conversation.
You make a point about the guns, we have a huge gun problem. But no one wants to fix that, why not at least try to fix both?
Number 1: There are tons of guns and tons of people with guns people with guns and tons of criminals with tons of guns in the US.
Number 2: Number 2 isn't going to change anytime soon, even though some wish it would.
Number 3: Having an unarmed police force is an absolutely terrible idea for this country.
If a few bad police are the problem we're trying to solve, then let's do what it takes to weed those out and do our best from preventing them from joining in the first place.
And let's use some common sense and understand that even the best people make mistakes. That's going to be part of the process. Is it sad and unfortunate? It sure is. But it is also part of an imperfect life in an imperfect world.
I agree, so many traffic stops end up in deadly encounters over nothing.....enforcing traffic laws could easily be performed by non police individuals who only have the power to write tickets. like you said this is already done by most major nations throughout the world.
Small view of the worldYep this is the real issue....