When you say Carolina are you just talking about nc only or you talking nc and sc
I just mean east of the mountains really, and that in comparison to the Christmas Eve anafrontal setup this is a far better way to try to score. Way too far out there to talk details about anything, but it
is I suppose possible that SC could get into the play with the sort of Christmas day cold push models are advertising,
if timing improves and the Christmas trough does not leave so quickly. Though obviously NC is the favored location for a winter storm.
It's also worth noting that only a GFS-type solution would make this storm a possibility, in terms of the large-scale pattern aloft. The GFS is actually the most amplified of all models for Christmas. Here's a comparison of the latest operational model runs on 12z the 25th- check out the strength and position of height anomalies over the eastern US and also downstream over Newfoundland/the North Atlantic:
There's a pretty clear spread here from the slowest and weakest ECMWF to the fastest and strongest GFS. The "fastest" part definitely raises some alarms, since the GFS has a known progressive bias. But it seems counter-intuitive to me that faster would equate to a
more amplified pattern, so I don't know that this is such a cut-and-dry situation.
Regardless, these details will determine whether we establish a strong -NAO down the road. GFS manages to retrograde this ridge like feature westward over Greenland, while the other models keep a strong height anomaly but in a less desirable location. The differences over the central-Eastern US and Canada as a result are obvious. Note that the GFS has the remnants of our big trough trapped near Hudson Bay, but I can't pick out where those remnants went on the other two models.
The best thing to track for now would be the ensembles for the Christmas time-period. The 12z GEFS trended towards a more amplified pattern for that storm, in line with the operational model. I'm curious to see how the ECMWF and EPS in particular look today.