• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry More SE Snow ? (1/16-1/18)

26903750_1548944805142265_2763390093470515993_n.jpg
 
Here is latest hrrr run. It has the band dying as it crosses through NW Alabama...have to watch to see if that trend continues as we move forward.

View attachment 3015
One reason it is dying out. Is because the hrrr only goes out to 18 hours. And so it not that reliable at that hour. I would trust it at 10 and under hours.
 
Here is latest hrrr run. It has the band dying as it crosses through NW Alabama...have to watch to see if that trend continues as we move forward.

View attachment 3015
The HRRR is good at times but even it is like most other models and best in it's "short range" not "long range", seriously I think it's great within 10 hours, sometimes beyond that it changes can be often and significant. Just something to think about.... wouldn't worry too much about it showing that at hr 18
 
Just a note, the NAM has nine hours of good returns over central AL on composite radar, yet doesn't print out much QPF or snowfall. I guess it is saying a small dry layer at the surface evaporates it. Keep an eye on that.
 
Does anyone think that 1/9-10/1962 MIGHT be an analog for this for ATL and RDU?

http://library.noaa.gov/Collections/Digital-Documents/US-Daily-Weather-Maps

Like now, the PNA, NAO, and AO were solidly + while the EPO was pretty neutral. ENSO was then cold neutral, which isn't too far off the current borderline weak/moderate La Nina. Like for this one, there was no Gulf surface low and there was a SW-NE oriented band of overrunning behind a very strong cold front though the surface high of 1/1962 was much stronger at 1060 mb vs the current one of only 1045 mb. Like for this one, surface winds at ATL were NW.
 
Back
Top