My plots always take forever. Haven't had time to optimizeBouncy bounced?
StormVista will have them first. The files are huge
My plots always take forever. Haven't had time to optimizeBouncy bounced?
And SV is behind as well, this is torture lolMy plots always take forever. Haven't had time to optimize
StormVista will have them first. The files are huge
Well since it’s a monster who is it a monster for lolIt could be a while, the data download process for all ensemble members hasn't even completed yet, not sure what the hold up is.
If this goes on much longer, I'll just render the members I downloaded and will share.
we are like 6 year old kids. At Christmas. You goin' let us peek at it or make us wait to unwrap it all?It could be a while, the data download process for all ensemble members hasn't even completed yet, not sure what the hold up is.
If this goes on much longer, I'll just render the members I downloaded and will share.
From Jonathan Wall
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And taller ridge out westOur N/S looks to have moved west early on with the NAM.
While we wait, had chatgpt take a stab at it.View attachment 190299
That's the stuff you get in New England nor'easters. Just over 2"/hr.BUFKIT put down a foot of snow at RDU from 1z to 6z on sunday.
Think about that.
Yall didn’t see a foot on 1/23/03?meant a foot whoops
If I remember correctly didn’t RDU get 17 inches in five or six hours during the Crusher?That's the stuff you get in New England nor'easters. Just over 2"/hr.
nope. i wasn’t alive yet anyways but webber put out a map sometime ago that showed the last foot of snow for everyone in nc and here it was like 1984 or something like thatYall didn’t see a foot on 1/23/03?
It was 16" in 4 hours.If I remember correctly didn’t RDU get 17 inches in five or six hours during the Crusher?
Now that was a magical storm. The evolution of this event had some similarities with a Lee side trof.nope. i wasn’t alive yet anyways but webber put out a map sometime ago that showed the last foot of snow for everyone in nc and here it was like 1984 or something like that
How do we boost the QPF? Like get ratios …. But why waste them I want 1-1.5” QPF so someone can go wild
Especially with ratios around 15:1 maybe 16:1
1” QPF = 15”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Still having data downloading issues (ON THEIR END), so I decided to go ahead and render the members that I already downloaded. Here's one of the members, rendering the others now.. but this is the first thing I saw when downloading this data (in a much uglier ZARR data opener)
View attachment 190300View attachment 190301View attachment 190302
I love the location of the coastal low with this NextWeather 2 run! Much better stuff than the last few runs from this model. Now we are looking at something that could be epic for many of us.Still having data downloading issues (ON THEIR END), so I decided to go ahead and render the members that I already downloaded. Here's one of the members, rendering the others now.. but this is the first thing I saw when downloading this data (in a much uglier ZARR data opener)
View attachment 190300View attachment 190301View attachment 190302
Yeah looking at Webb’s maps, it looks like you missed a foot by about 30 miles to the north in Jan 2003 and 15 miles or so to the southeast in February 2004.nope. i wasn’t alive yet anyways but webber put out a map sometime ago that showed the last foot of snow for everyone in nc and here it was like 1984 or something like that
This the biggest run to run shift you seen from this thing at this range?
Still having data downloading issues (ON THEIR END), so I decided to go ahead and render the members that I already downloaded. Here's one of the members, rendering the others now.. but this is the first thing I saw when downloading this data (in a much uglier ZARR data opener)
View attachment 190300View attachment 190301View attachment 190302
Is it trying to develop the low in the eastern Gulf?Here's member 2: I don't want to clutter up the thread with these images, but you get the idea..
View attachment 190309View attachment 190310View attachment 190311View attachment 190312
View attachment 190313
It's hard to tell because I haven't seen the full ensemble yet. Part of the reason it is so consistent is because it is a 68-member well-dispersed ensemble.This the biggest run to run shift you seen from this thing at this range?