It's STILL doing this?! Either this model is on to something, or this model needs some more machine learning.AIGFS increased once again for ATL! WOW!
At around 0.25" QPF for north ATL. That's 5" at a 20:1 ratio.
View attachment 191554
Everyone NE of I 26 and N of I 20 with 6”+. Would love it
Truly a Carolina Crusher here. This would please so many folks across the board.
So, weird.... but the Kuchera value for Augusta is actually lower than the 10:1 ratio here... 10:1 shows 2.7 for AGS while Kuchera is half an inch less... shouldn't ratios be higher for this event (even in AGS)?
You can go to the NBM Dashboard, select the NBM run for version 4.3, select the parameter, and hour, and it tells you the models used in it. Them not using the Euro Op but using the GFS op is wild to me. As is using the oldest data from the Euro ens out of every model.NBMv4 has these models/weights:
NBMv5 (parallel) is a bit different but the weights haven't been released. Pretty sure they removed SREF and added AI Models (like AIFS). They also do some different bias correction methods in v5 such as probability matched mean to achieve more accurate/unsmoothed outputs.
View attachment 191545
That is so much better to the eyes than pivotal.
NBMv4 has these models/weights:
NBMv5 (parallel) is a bit different but the weights haven't been released. Pretty sure they removed SREF and added AI Models (like AIFS). They also do some different bias correction methods in v5 such as probability matched mean to achieve more accurate/unsmoothed outputs.
View attachment 191545

final would be a minimum of 6 inches across ne ga. would be 3 to as much as 5 on the east side of atl.AIGFS increased once again for ATL! WOW!
At around 0.25" QPF for north ATL. That's 5" at a 20:1 ratio.
View attachment 191554

The whole model progression has been pretty spectacular in my opinion for the Carolinas. We had some model runs to the SW, some to the NE, and they've converged on us now. And the 50/50 low hanging in and trending some SW was huge. All of that has been great. Now just the fine details.CMC a good hit too, good trends at 0z tonight that's for sure. Now can we hold them through go time
View attachment 191562
At the projected ratio (22:1), 0.41" would become 8.8".
I'll be staying up for the 6z HRRR!RAP going insane rn holyView attachment 191569
Is your list a list of included models? Because if so, it appears to includes numerous Euro ensemble members.You can look at the NBM Dashboard. It lists no OP Euro that I see, and 0z Euro ens members, and 6z GEFS ens members for 18z.
Model Date Cycle Projection Valid Date
ECMWFE P1 20260129 0 60 2026013112
GEFS P27 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P26 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P25 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P24 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P23 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P22 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P21 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P20 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P2 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P28 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P19 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P17 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P16 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P15 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P14 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P13 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P12 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P11 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P10 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P1 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P18 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P29 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P3 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P30 20260129 6 54 2026013112
SREF ARW P6 20260129 3 57 2026013112
SREF ARW P4 20260129 3 57 2026013112
SREF ARW P3 20260129 3 57 2026013112
SREF ARW P2 20260129 3 57 2026013112
SREF ARW P1 20260129 3 57 2026013112
SREF ARW N6 20260129 3 57 2026013112
SREF ARW N4 20260129 3 57 2026013112
SREF ARW N3 20260129 3 57 2026013112
SREF ARW N2 20260129 3 57 2026013112
SREF ARW N1 20260129 3 57 2026013112
RAPX 20260129 15 45 2026013112
NAMH 20260129 12 48 2026013112
HRRRX 20260129 12 48 2026013112
HIRESW FV3 20260129 12 48 2026013112
GFS 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P9 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P8 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P7 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P6 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P5 20260129 6 54 2026013112
GEFS P4 20260129 6 54 2026013112
ECMWFE P9 20260129 0 60 2026013112
WRF ARW 20260129 12 48 2026013112
ECMWFE P8 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P6 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P28 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P27 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P26 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P25 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P24 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P23 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P22 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P21 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P20 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P29 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P2 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P18 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P17 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P16 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P15 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P14 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P13 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P12 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P11 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P10 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P19 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P3 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P30 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P31 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P50 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P5 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P49 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P48 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P47 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P46 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P45 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P44 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P43 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P42 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P41 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P40 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P4 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P39 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P38 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P37 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P36 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P35 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P34 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P33 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P32 20260129 0 60 2026013112
ECMWFE P7 20260129 0 60 2026013112
WRF MEM2 20260129 12 48 2026013112
This could be too light but generally I’ve always been high on totals ingesting all the data in. This just has the making, with great dynamics, to be something really special here. Can’t get better ratios for the Carolina’s. Add a coastal and upper low magic? Too many things can go right that can offset a few dry pockets here and there.My first and only call map. Very not professional looking but my general thoughts. Dry slots are a thing but I think with all the dynamics at play plus great snow ratios the lower end who busts still get a few inches of snow.
I think Raleigh and Charlotte are golden and will each pick up their own maximum amount of snowfall. Then in those spots there will be an area that can get 10+ inches of snow. Those dotted areas can of course shift anywhere in those zones depending on where banding develops.
Let’s see how I do!
(This is NC only I didn’t give much thought to areas outside but I suppose anywhere outside of zone 1 will more than likely see 1-3)
View attachment 191561
these ratios are acceptableAt the projected ratio (22:1), 0.41" would become 8.8".
At the projected ratio (22:1), 0.41" would become 8.8".
That is so much better to the eyes than pivotal.
Heavy axis rides right down the median of i95 from pedros (SOB) to the rest area on va/nc line
Gotta have some chasers showing up there....Cantore / Timmer