I think it’s a very wild pattern .. with large amounts of blocking like we are seeing it’s much harder to predict how certain pieces will interact with others because the atmosphere is doing wild things under those blocks.. add in some SSW and youre bound to have inconsistencies.. I do believe as soon as they get a handle on the pattern things should start seeming more accurate and less wild.. they just need some time to figure out what the hoot is going onThis is the worst run to run inconsistency I’ve ever seen. There is little to look at beyond D5. The trash heap of tossed model runs is growing exponentially.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I feel like that dump out west comes out much fast than what the op run is showing... That is a nice high nosing down tho.Monster wedge at D9 on the euro but the pattern as a whole is suboptimal
I hope so, can't wait to see if the EPS supports it. Realistically even if it was legit that -nao would likely pay off for NC/TN not so much farther southI feel like that dump out west comes out much fast than what the op run is showing... That is a nice high nosing down tho.
Welp there goes the warm weather, we better get a storm out of this. You were all thinking it don't downvote me
Sharply I-40 based though.
Not our typical ridge. We can very well snow if our boundary sets up correctly.One thing I’m noticing is the significant retrogression of the pattern, as the pacific block heads <<<<<<, so does the trough with it and the ridge out ahead, I’m noticing the models want to slowly retrograde our ridge to the central Us and SW, and bring the trough in the Atlantic towards the ECView attachment 65907View attachment 65908View attachment 65909