• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Jan. 17-18, 2026 SE Winter Weather Threat

bouncycorn said:
Nope, across the board, the AIFS/AIFS-ENS is the best publicly-available model suite available currently. AIGFS is quite a bit worse -- on par with the conventional ECMWF-IFS.

There will certainly be cases where the ECMWF data assimilation techniques probablistically get it 'wrong' which would impact all downstream models (ECMWF-IFS, AIFS, EPS, AIFS-ENS, GRAF).. but most of the time, ECMWF has superior data assimilation techniques. And, typically, if there are issues with the ECMWF DA, you'd see divergence between the ECMWF-based/initialized models and models that use different DA (GFS, ICON, CMC, UKM).

In this case, the GFS/AIGFS are on an island of their own.. so this makes me think that there could be data assimilation issues with GFS.
Click to expand...
this is heavy stuff. reading your findings gives me a sense of, if the aifs is locked in, then why even bother with anything else
 
Ross said:
this is heavy stuff. reading your findings gives me a sense of, if the aifs is locked in, then why even bother with anything else
Click to expand...
I get AIFS is definitely advancing but I'm not convinced there isn't any fail modes. Can't forget what happened last year

Sampling not long ago appears to look generally better for the south
 
iwantsouthernsnow123 said:
I get AIFS is definitely advancing but I'm not convinced there isn't any fail modes. Can't forget what happened last year

Sampling not long ago appears to look generally better for the south
Click to expand...
the siren song of advocating for a nw trend is alluring but hard to argue against bouncycorn's thesis. just gotta live through it to find out
 
Ksnow33 said:
EPS didn't really improve with regards to precipitation amounts
Click to expand...

Roxboro was similar but just to your east in E NC had an increase, especially coastal areas. E SC/SE GA had a moderate increase to the best run yet, which is a surprise to me as I had expected a NW trend. There was actually a bit of a SE trend from 18Z. I still think the amounts are overdone considering borderline temps.
IMG_7112.gif

Members:
IMG_7110.png

IMG_7111.png
 
iwantsouthernsnow123 said:
I get AIFS is definitely advancing but I'm not convinced there isn't any fail modes. Can't forget what happened last year

Sampling not long ago appears to look generally better for the south
Click to expand...

I have to agree with you. I am very weary of buying the eastern solutions for this storm even if it’s for a model suite that’s supposed to be the best thing since sliced bread, which it’s not. The AIFS has its own issues and rarely gets the details right even if the pattern isn’t much different. The details are what will matter a lot here because of the positive feedbacks that happen between sloped moist ascent, warm advection, and the overall synoptic pattern/wave tilt.

If we had a big 50-50 low sitting to the NE I would be willing to bite on the eastern camp because we would have something to stop the northward advance of this event and a lot of times the GFS gets underestimates how much this can suppress things. Oth, there’s nothing stopping this from trending north to its heart’s content that is what worries me here for the Carolinas.
 
Stormdoc said:
Good thoughts about the storm here in the Carolinas. I am hoping some stronger dynamics may be able to overcome some of the warm air advection, especially if it pivots and turns negative as it pulls away. There should be some good confluence with the PV in SE Canada, and 850s are like going to also crash quite cold after the pivot, so hoping it will be able to keep the mid levels and surface colder as long as we get heavier precipitation. Of course, this could be my inner weenie wishcasting 🤔
Click to expand...

When you have an overrunning type event like this, the cold air usually needs to get here first or you need to have a way to viably transport it here to thwart the mid level warm advection and LHR aloft, we just do not have in this setup. We are waiting for the cold air to show up and bulldoze thru the mtns as the precip begins, much less at midday which will only slow up the front even more. That of course also causes a sudden north shift in this precip too because your primary forcing mechanism to generate it is tied to moist ascent over top the front itself. I just don’t like anything I’m seeing wrt cold air transport in the Carolinas.

We don’t have confluence to the NE, this is actually a very diffluent pattern over SE Canada with a ridge offshore Newfoundland and a trough axis that a farther away zonally over Manitoba than it is down south

IMG_7245.png
 
I could honestly see how a scenario like the RRFS happens. The cold air just takes too long to here in the Carolinas and the snow is mostly confined to the mtns, foothills, and western Piedmont, with AL-GA-MS cashing in

sn10_acc-imp.us_se.png

ref1km_ptype.us_se.png
 
Webberweather53 said:
I could honestly see how a scenario like the RRFS happens. The cold air just takes too long to here in the Carolinas and the snow is mostly confined to the mtns, foothills, and western Piedmont, with AL-GA-MS cashing in

View attachment 183622

View attachment 183623
Click to expand...
Webb you believe the Euro will trend NW and send more precipitation for the gulf coast for Sat/Sun storm?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top