Jessy89
Member
When’s the last run of gfs?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
When’s the last run of gfs?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe Larry or Webb can answer this, SOI has been largely positive this month, is that normal in these type nino events? I know negative SOI values usually support ninos.
Yeah. We had some minor flooding issues with last Thursday's system. Looks like the weather is stuck in a holding pattern.Still wet in the SE in case anyone forgot.
View attachment 9820
FV3 GFS should become operational in late January (Jan 24)....With the government shutdown, it could take as long as March (I’ll add that’s always been the case and it’s been mentioned it should be done within the first two quarters of FY2019 ). The GFS will still be operational until that time, so unfortunately it will still be with us as we ring in the new year.
It was! I was a little kid and remember the snow being over my knees and drifts over my waistI bet this was awesome !!!![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RIP GFS.
I just took a look at it, that ridge looks ugly. If that look holds true, the weather is going to be boring through early Jan. winter weather wise. It looks zonal starting on 1/8. Storm systems would track west to east basically. There will probably be some colder days, but no severe cold. By mid month, we *may be in a colder pattern. We'll see, I'm very cautious when it comes to the longer range.Congrats, folks, the first tall western ridge related cold mirage of 2019 has already made its appearance. Yay! See the 0Z GEFS for 1/14-16. This is exciting!!
Well, I would take my chances with that zonal flow. It’s better then having to fight with that southeast ridge. By looking at it it takes it out of the way.I just took a look at it, that ridge looks ugly. If that look holds true, the weather is going to be boring through early Jan. winter weather wise. It looks zonal starting on 1/8. Storm systems would track west to east basically. There will probably be some colder days, but no severe cold. By mid month, we *may be in a colder pattern. We'll see, I'm very cautious when it comes to the longer range.
Here is what bothers me.... the eps has an even better MJO forecast by then vs GEFS but still looks like poop. I don’t buy the eps.And so as this image shows this latest GEFS has a solid -AO that starts 1/14 and stays for the rest of the run along with a solid -NAO that had become established much earlier in the run. By then the MJO should be in 7-8 and good Nino climo should just be arriving. +PNA/-NAO/-AO/MJO 7-8/weak Nino/mid Jan. Don't get excited, Larry, don't get excited. It is just a mirage. Cold bias. Don't fall for it. The mega-zonal EPS is going to deflate our dreams. It is like the movie Ground Hog Day all over again.
Edit: I do think the EPS is way overdoing the zonal flow. I think that may even be a bias of recent months. Remember when it was very slow in catching onto the colder pattern change in the fall?
Here is what bothers me.... the eps has an even better MJO forecast by then vs GEFS but still looks like poop. I don’t buy the eps.
Agreed. GEFS came down from the unrealistic forecast while eps came up.Keep in mind that a couple of days ago for a couple of days the GEFS had the MJO off the chart. And now it is well down within the chart. So, I think the MJO is still adjusting toward reality on both the GEFS and EPS though they're still far apart.
Meanwhile Doc still looks like doo doo. No surprise there.
I’ve been watching the ensembles but haven’t really found them helpful as the GEFS has consistently folded like a cheap lawn chair inside 200hrs. Every tool we have is struggling with the MJO and the progression thereof. People can get on here and complain about the people complaining but the truth is they don’t know either and the complainers and LR OP evaluators keep the site clicks coming in. None of what I just said was a shot at you. Just wanted to air that last part outIf your gonna trust anything this far out trust the ensembles not each op. The overall picture is the GEFS looked better and so did the FV3. The GFS is at the end of its life and shouldn’t be taken that serious especially in this situation. So we should continue to see if this remains a trend in the days to come.
I’ve been watching the ensembles but haven’t really found them helpful as the GEFS has consistently folded like a cheap lawn chair inside 200hrs. Every tool we have is struggling with the MJO and the progression thereof. People can get on here and complain about the people complaining but the truth is they don’t know either and the complainers and LR OP evaluators keep the site clicks coming in. None of what I just said was a shot at you. Just wanted to air that last part out
Maybe Larry or Webb can answer this, SOI has been largely positive this month, is that normal in these type nino events? I know negative SOI values usually support ninos.
great point!good grief. In 2019 you would think we could do better with our forecast models. We can launch a shuttle into space and bring it back in one piece but we can’t tell if it’s going to be hot or cold in 10 daysView attachment 9825View attachment 9826
Great agreement between GEFS/EPS in the 6-10. But by day 12 they really start to diverge. Posted in the banter thread about how much the GEFS has been struggling in the day 10+ wanting to rush the blocking.
View attachment 9836View attachment 9837
We’ve spent a lot of time reading about and discussing the mjo lately. And there have been a lot of posts both lamenting the fact that it has spent so much time in the warm phases and imploring it to get into the cold phases. Nowhere does anyone seem to be suggesting that even if it makes it into the cold phases, our pattern may not improve. I assume that is legitimately possible, but I don’t see that outcome being given any weight. Maybe I’m wrong, though. I guess we will find out eventually.Here is what bothers me.... the eps has an even better MJO forecast by then vs GEFS but still looks like poop. I don’t buy the eps.
We’ve spent a lot of time reading about and discussing the mjo lately. And there have been a lot of posts both lamenting the fact that it has spent so much time in the warm phases and imploring it to get into the cold phases. Nowhere does anyone seem to be suggesting that even if it makes it into the cold phases, our pattern may not improve. I assume that is legitimately possible, but I don’t see that outcome being given any weight. Maybe I’m wrong, though. I guess we will find out eventually.
That wasn’t at all what I was suggesting. I know it WILL. That’s why I said I guess we will find out eventually (and here’s the point/question I was driving at)...eventually, when it DOES make it into the cold phase, is there a possibility that it does not force the kind of pattern that people are expecting? I’m not pointing at any particular post or poster, but by and large, I would guess 99% of the posts on the subject expect that it will force a favorable pattern when it makes it to 7 and on. I was merely wondering if something else might be driving the pattern that might override the positive effects of a favorable mjo, because I haven’t really seen that thrown out as a possibility. But I might have missed it. I was just curious.It will make it to the "cold" phases (phase 7-8, etc), to suggest this may not happen at this juncture is ridiculous. The pattern may not be bitterly cold but it's not going to stay mild like this
If we were to have an amp phase 8 as shown here...What would that look like for us?The CFSv2 MJO forecast amplitude is arguably the most realistic of available NWP but it's almost certainly way too fast with propagation into the Western Hemisphere. The Euro several days ago tried to dissolve the MJO before moving into phase 6 while the GFS was off the charts, the middle of the road solution which the CFSv2 has actually had for a while now won out & will continue to do so for the foreseeable future imo. Delay the phase 8-1 forecast by several days-week or so and that's probably pretty close to what we'll see. -NAOs lag Pacific MJO forcing by a week or two (for various reasons), I don't expect this case to be much different in a general sense.
View attachment 9840
That wasn’t at all what I was suggesting. I know it WILL. That’s why I said I guess we will find out eventually (and here’s the point/question I was driving at)...eventually, when it DOES make it into the cold phase, is there a possibility that it does not force the kind of pattern that people are expecting? I’m not pointing at any particular post or poster, but by and large, I would guess 99% of the posts on the subject expect that it will force a favorable pattern when it makes it to 7 and on. I was merely wondering if something else might be driving the pattern that might override the positive effects of a favorable mjo, because I haven’t really seen that thrown out as a possibility. But I might have missed it. I was just curious.
I didn’t mean to be ridiculous and it will never get there by using the word IF above. It was just a standard phrase in a conversational string of typing.
If this is true...why trust the GEFS?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If we were to have an amp phase 8 as shown here...What would that look like for us?