I see the 8-day 18ZGFS has begun the NW trend of the 12Z clipper. From Huntsville to Sue St Marie Michigan.
Normal (or average actually) temps are determined by an average of the past 3 decades of 10yr data sets. Currently using this span of time 1991-2020.
Think I have that correct but others here can confirm.
It’s apps runner city on the ensembles, lots of rain in our future.
Good need rain we know 5/15-9/1 will be a desertIt’s apps runner city on the ensembles, lots of rain in our future.
We just had a recalibration and dropped the colder 80s and we still spend most time above average. bUt GlObAl WaRmInG aInT rEaLI mean maybe it’s recency bias but I don’t remember a winter in the last 10 where we spent an equal amount of time BN and AN. I am looking forward to the recalibration in 10 years when it doesn’t always have to look so orange and red.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
80s where just as warm as they where cold,if not more so.We just had a recalibration and dropped the colder 80s and we still spend most time above average. bUt GlObAl WaRmInG aInT rEaL
Is that the forecast?We get an east based mod- strong el nino next season,it will be a carbon copy of this one. Start preparing mentally now just to be safe.
Our averages went up when we dropped the 80s so they definitely were colder than the last 30 years.80s where just as warm as they where cold,if not more so.
I'm with you sir...sick of the rain! Nice day tomorrow and Saturday then it's riser and repeat.Just like every other Nina year...
At this point,
?
I'd take warm or cold dry.
We've had way too much rain.
I'm not an anti rain guy but,
This is too much.
I really wish we did unsmoothed averages that encompassed the sites life cycle and not a 30 year subset smoothed to make it pretty. Then you just update the averages as each day goes by. I mean why not just use a 30 year period for records as well and just ignore what happened previously. This stuff just irks meWe just had a recalibration and dropped the colder 80s and we still spend most time above average. bUt GlObAl WaRmInG aInT rEaL
And btw that last part isn't at anyone on this board. It's the non weather folk saying that on Twitter and FB when we set one cold record here and there but constantly smash heat records that get annoying
That would be a great way to do it I agree. Snowfall as well all the way back as far as records go. It would no doubt still show a rise in temps and decline in snow. Brad Panovich shares the all time snow average vs 30 year average several times a year. All time is 5.8 and 30 year is 3.6. But I will say the last 30 years have probably made the warming and decreased snowfall look worse than it really is because we've dropped the 60s, 70s and 80s which seemed to be abnormally colder and snowier compared to the previous decades, all back to back.I really wish we did unsmoothed averages that encompassed the sites life cycle and not a 30 year subset smoothed to make it pretty. Then you just update the averages as each day goes by. I mean why not just use a 30 year period for records as well and just ignore what happened previously. This stuff just irks me
IndeedThat would be a great way to do it I agree. Snowfall as well all the way back as far as records go. It would no doubt still show a rise in temps and decline in snow. Brad Panovich shares the all time snow average vs 30 year average several times a year. All time is 5.8 and 30 year is 3.6. But I will say the last 30 years have probably made the warming and decreased snowfall look worse than it really is because we've dropped the 60s, 70s and 80s which seemed to be abnormally colder and snowier compared to the previous decades, all back to back.
Did you move to Jonesville?Good need rain we know 5/15-9/1 will be a desert
They had more rain than me last summerDid you move to Jonesville?
It's approx. one bleepin' degree (F). Colors can be deceptiveThat is incredible! Why are we even here? Shut the whole thing down!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RAH now going that way as well.Beautiful day ahead on Sunday!! View attachment 130679View attachment 130680