It's interesting to see the +- 10 degree difference between the modeled snow cover lolipops in Georgia and SC and the just ice-covered areas. I don't think the model is properly handling the albedo of heavy ice and sleet accumulations relative to snow cover.
If you get a rad cooling night right after this event you can go absolutely lunar and absolutely have some really strange spreads of temps.
I was being a bit facetious. If our serious board here in this forum were hugging those two models because it reflected the opposite but the rest were in the midwest camp we'd even be redflagging (second guessing) ourselves about such bias.
Honest question here. So they are going with the pop density centers because that is where the $$ are or is it because they are based out of Indiana and have a local bias? Otherwise I have to believe they are just betting on climo or trolling for hits
I think he's Midwest based, but yeah, true. Yeah, Greenwood Indiana.
That’s the look. Been a long time.
I thought the same. On the other hand, we don't need to see beyond what the model had at 84. If true at 84, there is zero doubt that extrapolated would be positively historic.
I've done enough ice storms in my life, I'm good
We’re gonna have a new definition for what a NAM’ing really looks like when it gets in range.
Imagine trolling this guy if somewhere in Arkansas gets 29 inches. lol
That’s called being realistic. I think those of us who have been doing this a while, especially south of I-85, have that gut feeling that the snow is going to be more confined to the north. Heck, that gut feeling kept me awake last night thinking about buying a generator and eventually caving to it, even though the Euro and GFS both show my area getting more sleet than anything else.
Same. My daughter lives nearby, off a winding, hilly road that is perpetually in the shade from many large trees with overhead utilities.
LOL a pack of dogs had a blast when my sister did that in a storm. Make sure it has a good latch!
Indy suburbs
