bouncycorn
Meteorologist
It shows wet snow with temps in the mid to upper 30s
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep Huffman has discussed this many times before and you or Shane can probably explain it but for the SE the 540 line isn't a good factor for rn/sn and good thing too. LolThe 850mb line is really what one should look at for the rain/snow line (ignoring in-situ shallow layers that form), not really the 540.
Looks to me like the low pressure is moving out to sea and the next frame wouldn't have much. But then again, we are dissecting the DGEX...smh...Next frame of the DGEX would show substantially more snow into SC/NC me thinks.
Screw Alabama lolDGEX FTW... here ya go lol
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
Nice! This has to be the times my dad speaks of when he says he remembers having to help dig out a path to their outhouse and like a wall of snow on each side. Lol.... I didn't believe him, you know the 'ol "walked to school up hill both ways in the snow" stories haha but as a 7 year old at that time I'm sure it seemed like walls of snow to himOn this date in 1948, the 2nd crippling snowstorm in nearly a week smashed the northern coastal plain and tidewater regions of North Carolina, dropping up to 19 inches of snow in Elizabeth City. The combined 2-storm snow totals approached 2.5 feet in parts of Halifax, Nash, Edgecombe, Wilson, and Northampton counties. The overall setup was rather unusual for a Miller A, with very weak surface lows tracking well offshore in the midst of high-latitude blocking centered over the northeastern Pacific w/ an attendant deep upper level trough over eastern Canada and Greenland and a southeast US ridge. (sounds familiar eh?). Normally, when you see this much snow over the eastern portion state, you'd anticipate to see high-latitude blocking dominating the North Atlantic and strong &/or very strong surface cyclones just offshore, not a weak frontal wave in association w/ a bonafide overrunning event. Yeah, early February 1948 is very strange and defies most canonical winter storm setups in eastern and central NC...
View attachment 51
View attachment 52
View attachment 53
View attachment 54
View attachment 55
Sorry for the OT, how do you change your timezone. My times are messed up on here
Yep, thank you sir!I changed it for ya, did it work?
Nice! This has to be the times my dad speaks of when he says he remembers having to help dig out a path to their outhouse and like a wall of snow on each side. Lol.... I didn't believe him, you know the 'ol "walked to school up hill both ways in the snow" stories haha but as a 7 year old at that time I'm sure it seemed like walls of snow to him
Yep the more of these things you post the more I realize we have sucked over the past 20 years other than Jan 00 Jan 01There were a multitude of those instances in the early-mid 20th century in eastern-central NC... It's hard to believe given how crappy the winters have been in general the last several years, and the more storms I reconstruct, the more I begin to realize this fact, but events like these w/ 1-2+ feet of snow, and regular snow threats in November, as well as large accumulating snows in late October in the mountains for ex. were far more commonplace several decades ago. It's rather unfortunate that the climate has warmed significantly since then and we didnt have the capacity to track and analyze winter storms like this back in those days, I could only imagine what we would have found...
There were a multitude of those instances in the early-mid 20th century in eastern-central NC... It's hard to believe given how crappy the winters have been in general the last several years, and the more storms I reconstruct, the more I begin to realize this fact, but events like these w/ 1-2+ feet of snow, and regular snow threats in November, as well as large accumulating snows in late October in the mountains for ex. were far more commonplace several decades ago. It's rather unfortunate that the climate has warmed significantly since then and we didnt have the capacity to track and analyze winter storms like this back in those days, I could only imagine what we would have found...
Yep the more of these things you post the more I realize we have sucked over the past 20 years other than Jan 00 Jan 01
Yep the more of these things you post the more I realize we have sucked over the past 20 years other than Jan 00 Jan 01
Jon - Thanks and yes, as always and of course I'm "listening" - but between court appearances this week!I meant to post this yesterday but I never sent it...so Phil if you're listening..
Take the event about to unfold for the NE for example, on the mslp map we have a 1018 HP to the north and a 1031 HP in the central plains....and the NE about to get 12"+, why? Because of the phase with the northern stream, that's it.
We are looking at the same thing here. One shouldn't really focus on mslp HP values, it doesn't truly mean anything for this storm as we are clearly not going to have some kind of banana high or a solid wedge to help the SE with temps. What we have to rely on solely is the northern stream diving in out ahead of the surface low/ULL. There's no cold on the models when the ULL comes through because the northern stream isn't far south enough. The issue here is timing. The SE will be hard pressed to get a solution that will work out for everyone... We really need the ULL to hang back 12 hours or so AND a deep vortex to get anywhere close....problem is, also, depending on how far north the ULL ends up being, the vortex can phase with it early and a majority of us will be out of business. I don't think that will end up being the case given the suppression...but we can't have too much suppression as it leads to rain.