• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry Feb. 19-20

areas back west that dropped off this NAM run are still close on moistening up the sfc layer. could end up being pain

Here's 18z

1739845784340.png



00z
1739845804524.png


looks as good or better along/east US-1 QPF wise. also don't think it'll take much to get back to some qpf back west
 
Yeah, folks out west were saying this run sucked for them for good reason. Actually, didn’t expect that part after the SREF. Still good / great for C / E NC (I think even GSO ticked up) like to see another bigger run. Plenty of room for expansion of the precip field, too. The 12km NAM has warm noses galore, but the 3km looks better to me so far although I’m on my phone and so can’t really look into skew Ts, etc.

I honestly think there will be more precipitation in the foothills and mountains. The mountains always score.
 
View attachment 170221
areas further south and east improved but it still cut totals down for pretty much everyone that’s not extreme Ne NC and SW Va. the I77 corridor and west got absolutely robbed

I mean yea…. But now it literally just looks realistic bc it looks like every other model. Can someone with a yellow tag explain how in the world it’s 2025 and every 6hrs you see these wild swings 36hrs out ? Is it a setup thing ? Is it poor data ? I mean anyone ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Yeah, folks out west were saying this run sucked for them for good reason. Actually, didn’t expect that part after the SREF. Still good / great for C / E NC (I think even GSO ticked up) like to see another bigger run. Plenty of room for expansion of the precip field, too. The 12km NAM has warm noses galore, but the 3km looks better to me so far although I’m on my phone and so can’t really look into skew Ts, etc.

I honestly think there will be more precipitation in the foothills and mountains. The mountains always score.
Looks like RDU stayed all snow based on 3km NAM soundings. Got really close / isothermal at 0C a couple of hours.
nam4km_2025021800_045_KRDU.png
 
areas back west that dropped off this NAM run are still close on moistening up the sfc layer. could end up being pain

Here's 18z

View attachment 170219



00z
View attachment 170220


looks as good or better along/east US-1 QPF wise. also don't think it'll take much to get back to some qpf back west
That little snow hole up there in SWVA yeah that is where I am at. Just need that to fill in. It is literally just two counties 🤣
 
Maybe not as ham as I would've liked but over 18 hrs of snowfall, still snowing at end of run with 8"..... I'll take it

View attachment 170226
It looks like the NAM 3k has the same line of thunderstorms in the Gulf that that the HRRR showed. The line is oriented in a way that interferes with moisture transport.
 
It looks like the NAM 3k has the same line of thunderstorms in the Gulf that that the HRRR showed. The line is oriented in a way that interferes with moisture transport.
Yeah E/W thunderstorm complex will rob it, N/S orientation will actually help enhance it
 
the way NAM 3k is *so much* better than standard NAM 00z... the latter wants to hardly give even 4 inches to the highest-total areas of NC while 3k is readily handing out 5-7" for a decent swath of NE NC
 
From two different Mets on AmericanWX

"When the 3 km shows details differently than the 12 km, the 3 km is better way, way more than it isn’t. "

"Because the parent NAM is low resolution."

NAM 3km is to believed here.
 
Back
Top