You have almost all of that right. Change the word "so" to "no" and you'll be on it!Come on you know you want to fall for it again, that’s what makes winter in the SE so fun.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You have almost all of that right. Change the word "so" to "no" and you'll be on it!Come on you know you want to fall for it again, that’s what makes winter in the SE so fun.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Weenie of the year gets to name the December thread!I'd be down to have a weenie of the year contest, not sure how it would go over
TrollIn case anyone was wondering, that sucking sound you hear is some of our brethren getting sucked into a cold winter mirage, just waiting to crush the hopes and dreams of all who would dare to believe.
Must. Not. Give. In.
Lol y'all know I'm just lookin out for ya!Troll
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Then why even follow it if you know what it's going to do. (How am I doing so far? )Lol y'all know I'm just lookin out for ya!
That's actually pretty good. Impressive!Then why even follow it if you know what it's going to do. (How am I doing so far? )
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
House centipede. They eat some of the bad bugs apparently, but I find them really annoying next to the massive roaches I've been seeing this year.Van Denton in GSO started up his snow machine this evening.
View attachment 25958
also unrelated does anybody know what kind of bug this is
View attachment 25959
I'm to the point that when I'm on here and I see nothing but negative whamby'ish post in other threads I'm gonna start moving them, if it continues I'll just delete. And to be clear, posting factual comments based on modeling that shows negative results from what we want isn't the type of negative I'm speaking of.... y'all know. Dang it, it's like a cancer
I need more clarity pleaseI'm to the point that when I'm on here and I see nothing but negative whamby'ish post in other threads I'm gonna start moving them, if it continues I'll just delete. And to be clear, posting factual comments based on modeling that shows negative results from what we want isn't the type of negative I'm speaking of.... y'all know. Dang it, it's like a cancer
You serious Clark?I need more clarity please
Making a grand re-entrance I see
Maybe I misread your post. I thought this thread was supposed to contain those posts?You serious Clark?
Oh.... yeah it was intended for those post in other threads, I wasn't clear my bad. I meant they would be moved to this thread or deleted if it continued in other threads. I guess I should've posted that in the other thread to be clear. Oh well it was just I came on here and was tired of reading crap and made the post in haste.Maybe I misread your post. I thought this thread was supposed to contain those posts?