Interesting. Everything I'm finding is contradicting which state is better. I see a majority of evidence supporting -AAM during the winter for cold. Do you have the research that shows -AAM leads to a strong SER? I'm seeing that a +AAM is bad because storms can't slow down and amplify, as in, the CONUS pattern is too progressive to lead to digging to put it in our terms. I'd be interested to learn the other side, as I just thought I was figuring it out until I saw your post. lol. I also saw that a -AAM could vary over the CONUS (Warm/cold over the SE) based on the IO state. Yet another 3 letter word that could mean different things at different times.
For the SE US? For the upper Midwest and westward, for example, the -AAM/La Nina tends to be colder. All that I learned is directly from Maxar pro mets. As I said, look at January and see what period was colder. Jan 1-16 at KATL was +11 but Jan 17-31 was -2. Tat being said, it is just one index and no one index is totally in control. We need the +AO to go away to allow us to have a good shot at a +PNA. That could pose a problem.
I just googled it for an internet link,. From here:
https://business.weather.com/blog/a...mechanism-and-future-implications-this-summer
"During low AAM states, the atmosphere is often in a La Nina driven pattern, where upper-level cold troughs impact the West and a ridge builds over the southeastern U.S. "
"Low" AAM = -AAM
Last edited: