drfranklin
Member
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2016
- Messages
- 475
- Reaction score
- 688
never toss a hot model - always blend!Toss warm models at your own risk!
never toss a hot model - always blend!Toss warm models at your own risk!
Well, I don't know what's wrong with the 0z GFS op. But, it's simulated radar is doing better, and it's probably more accurate.
One more jump down and we in bidness!
People were saying earlier to be careful using this, because it's soundings are wrong.
The problem I'm picking up is the GFS likely just isn't seeing the CAD well. The NAM might be too wild but I'm seeing enough in the short range models to say the GFS probably isn't doing well on CAD again.
Lol not that argument. We are going bitter across the SE tonight and that'll freeze the ground.I love it when Brad Travis says ground temps are too warm right now for significant accumulation Sunday Night and Monday.
Kinda funny past 2 nights we have lows at 24 degrees and highs of about 38. Hilarious.
That map lines up perfect with the gfs soundings from what I’ve seen
Yeah, I'm not so sure, the start of it looks like the NAM with the placement of frozen precip.People were saying earlier to be careful using this, because it's soundings are wrong.
The problem I'm picking up is the GFS likely just isn't seeing the CAD well. The NAM might be too wild but I'm seeing enough in the short range models to say the GFS probably isn't doing well on CAD again.
Does the fv3 pick up on cad better?
Gfs looks a bit clueless on thermals. ULL looked much better. LolThe GFS is dead to me . I’m riding the NAM into Tennessee for glory
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk