Call me crazy, but I'm not ready to throw the towel in yet here for the 23rd. Five days out leaves plenty of time for us to pump the +PNA a little more favorably and dig that trough a little more.
What’s 300 miles among friends?UKMET joined the good trends. I wonder if the Euro will follow. View attachment 127384
UKMET joined the good trends. View attachment 127384
Agree, the first wave dropping down after the Arctic blast cutter likely won't have enough room to breathe and amplify....the 2nd one dropping down should have the best chance, and tonight's CMC nails it. It needs a good ridge spike behind it of course to help it dig.Honestly, this is probably the time frame we should be watching; right as the pattern breaks down.
We should be sore from all of the can kicking and table setting, but this is our last shot before +EPO mild Pac air overruns the country. I think it will be a relatively brief respite though as we should go back into -EPO/+PNA stuff thereafter (I think -PNA is the least likely) as there are multiple reasons to think the jet won't retract back to the W Pac (more +EAMT coming, and tropical forcing should be favorable)....of course, who knows if any of that will do us any goodWe are great at can kicking
Looking at the 3 ensembles, can see here how the GEFS (1st image) doesn't have as good of a ridge spike out west at the key timeframe on Christmas Day. CMCE and EPS are more similar and have the better ridge spike (TPV over Western Canada has retrograded into AK on CMCE and EPS, but still lingering there on the GEFS).Agree, the first wave dropping down after the Arctic blast cutter likely won't have enough room to breathe and amplify....the 2nd one dropping down should have the best chance, and tonight's CMC nails it. It needs a good ridge spike behind it of course to help it dig.
She’s sticking to her guns. Won’t budge.Euro is a miss for most on the first system. Big differences from the GFS particularly over the western areas (AL/MS/TN)View attachment 127388
I'm not familiar with this model. Is it a blend of multiple model data/Ensemble data? Is it similar to NBM that the NWS uses?00z MMFS is in and it remains consistent. The 3 runs Saturday (12z, 18z, 00z) were very consistent. Maybe a slight west nudge on this run.
View attachment 127394View attachment 127395
No, it’s a stand-alone model not a blend.I'm not familiar with this model. Is it a blend of multiple model data/Ensemble data? Is it similar to NBM that the NWS uses?
Isn’t that good look? We are trending to something look it?
It is, but we need some work. I am willing to bet that there is more moisture with this look than what models are showingIsn’t that good look? We are trending to something look it?