I like to debate and argue because I'm a scientist by practice and nature unlike the vast majority of the rest of the forum, and we're supposed to be inherently skeptical and constantly questioning new ideas, hypotheses, and statements, especially to ones like yours that aren't supported by any actual, hard evidence wrt CoV-19. If you make claims without substantial evidence and data to back them up & don't consider potential confounding variables, then they certainly will be perceived as hasty or rash in many circles, and will be open to scrutiny like this in a scientific setting, getting really upset over that is unprofessional on your end.