• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry 1/9-12 Winter Potential Great Dane or Yorkie

I’m going to place my bet, the NAM just nailed that storm. Looks like exactly what’s going to happen.
it was realistic and believable as a high end solution imo for northern board members

imo it is oddly comforting that heights rose that much compared to 12z and yet it was still frozen precip down to wilmington
 
Either way, it's hard to believe a half inch of ice is going to accrue in a non-reinforcrd, shallow CAD.

The March 2014 ice storm did exactly that, IIRC (might've not been a half inch, but I believe it was at least a quarter and caused widespread power outages in GSO). Also ended up with a lot of sleet. Oddly, that was also a Miller A with in situ CAD that didn’t fully wear off until the end of the storm (and it was in the 60s a day or two later, which was nice considering the ice storm knocked out power for several days IMBY). We got a ton of IP, then to ZR and finally -RN at the end as temps climbed from 29ish to slightly above freezing by the end. It also wasn’t really forecasted until go time and warnings didn’t go out until after precip began, IIRC. Not sure if it’s much of a true analog to this one, but we can get ice storms from unusual situations like this.

march_6-7_2014_nc_snowmap.gif


Of course, that’s a setup that works better for the Triad than Triangle, but it is January rather than March now. In situ CAD usually lasts longer at the surface than forecasted, IMO.

Wasn’t February 2014 in situ CAD, too? (Of course, that’s did change to rain for the Triangle whereas the Triad mixed to sleet and ZR after 6” of snow.)
 
I just don't see how the Canadian can be taken seriously when its temperatures are so crazily off from all the other models and just common sense. 2-4 degrees is one thing, but the CMC is modeling temperatures 10-15 degrees lower than other models in some cases. Just doesn't add up to me.
 
it was realistic and believable as a high end solution imo for northern board members

imo it is oddly comforting that heights rose that much compared to 12z and yet it was still frozen precip down to wilmington
Walking such a tight rope. Get a bit better track, a lot of us party. Amp and cut more and we’ve got sleet to ZR to rain in places that think they’re chilling right now. Margins are so thin. Lots of little changes that make a big difference the next few days
 
it was realistic and believable as a high end solution imo for northern board members

imo it is oddly comforting that heights rose that much compared to 12z and yet it was still frozen precip down to wilmington
Yeah, the setup looks so complicated. The first potential phase with the Baja energy seems to juice the system up, but more northern energy diving down as the low moves east seems like it’s affecting the track more in the east? Maybe?
 
Looking over the GFDL model suite right now.. these are the highest res models that are resolving our system at this point. The first is the 6.5km global GFDL and the second is the 3km CONUS GFDL. Both are very cold and snowy. Theoretically, the higher res should be able to resolve these temp issues far better.. but I'm not sure if GFDL has a bias.

1736283347908.jpeg
1736283364824.jpeg1736283390340.jpeg1736283402561.jpeg
 
Not a chance the NAM is correct in amping it early on and then just sliding east. If it amps as early as shown, its cutting across southern GA and up the inland coast. It either amps early and cuts, or the amp isnt correct and its a classic miller A.....NAM can't have both, but it tried.
 
The latest NAM run was a step back in the right direction as far as the low pressure track and precipitation types for North Carolina. We don't want this to become overamped however pushing the track to the northwest. Lets see what the GFS shows when it starts running in a few minutes.
 
And probably will be this time as well...The low Thursday night and Fri morning in Atl is 22.
Using the NBM modeling product, the temp average for Atlanta for 12Z on Friday is 30, not 22. The GEM has 24 for that time frame but it often produces temps that are too low.
 
Not believing the accretion maps at all. Only has me at 30-32 degrees. Unless it's very light precipitation and heavy overcast or at night, you're not going to get that much ice to form with marginal surface temps. It's just a very cold rain for me. The coldest rain possible.
The 1973 Ice Storm in Atlanta had temperatures 30-32 for the entire storm
 
Looking over the GFDL model suite right now.. these are the highest res models that are resolving our system at this point. The first is the 6.5km global GFDL and the second is the 3km CONUS GFDL. Both are very cold and snowy. Theoretically, the higher res should be able to resolve these temp issues far better.. but I'm not sure if GFDL has a bias.

View attachment 160945
View attachment 160946View attachment 160947View attachment 160948
I bet the GFDL is doing what the hrrr did and leaving that cut off way back in the beginning. That really screws texas/arkansas/etc... but allows for more development later on and colder profiles like shown here.

I'm filing it in the not very likely category for now until another model hints at that happening.
 
Woof. ICON is way north for the I20 gang View attachment 160952
This is the part I am missing from the past few runs here.... The low takes a classic Miller A path right out in gulf on edge of panhandle across Florida then turns up the savannah coastline.....So where is the warm air aloft coming from it's not WAA if you have a Miller A track like that not cutting inland
 
Timing:

MRX Afternoon Discussion:

Thursday night lows will be in the teens to low 20s, with dewpoints firmly in the teens if not single digits, so cold air will be entrenched across the region to start the day Fri and precip should start/continue as snow through the event. Sometime after daybreak Friday, the precip shield with the developing system should be spreading our direction from MS/AL, with snowfall likely arriving by the mid morning hours in the Chattanooga area, midday towards the I-40 corridor, and early afternoon in the north. Ending time looks to be roughly 4-6 AM or so in the south, and something closer to 8-10 AM in the north. The end times could be a little premature as we transition to a northwest flow regime Saturday on the backside of the system, but as far as impactful snow accumulations in the lower elevations go, those times are probably good estimates at this time.

Precip types:

The forecast reflects snow, or perhaps a few short-lived periods of rain/snow mix, across the CWA at this time. Areas of possible
rain/snow mix at the beginning would be in the foothills of the TN mountains as H85 flow comes over the Appalachians and warms on it`s
decent into the valley. That`s reflected in the H85 temps on some models, but also worth noting that they`re still at/slightly below
freezing, so I think snow is the only ptype we`ll have to worry with. If the track of the system changes, ptypes could as well, but
at this point it appears we will be dealing with only snow

Snowfall amounts:

The trends in ensemble guidance over the last 24 hours have been upward with regards to amounts in general, and that`s especially so
with regards to probabilities of amounts greater than 4" or even 6". First off, previous forecasts had favored a relative maxima of
snowfall amounts being in the southern valley, and lesser amounts in the north. The trends have been to favor a spreading out of those
higher amounts across much of the CWA, with guidance now suggesting that a widespread 3-5" snowfall is possible across the forecast
area. Additionally, the 24hr probabilities of seeing great than or equal to 6" of snow by 7 AM Saturday have come up to non-dismissible
levels now, with some +40 percent odds across significant portions of the CWA. All of that said, it`s still too early to really hone in
on a particular value/range as the track of this system will have significant impacts on amounts. Suffice it to say that confidence in
a widespread winter weather event is definitively trending higher.
 
Couple of notes on the NAM thru 36:
The confluence is stronger and keeps inching further west. The N/S energy is stronger and further s

Looking at the soundings at least in the central and southern upstate, it's ZR.
that's lights out for southern upstate with our 1.4 inch snow in the Clinton area. :(
 
Hmm I wonder what they’re seeing. Their zr and heavy snow bubbles don’t include many east of the apps where heavy snow and zr has been showing on the models
The NWS is probably playing it conservative for now. Temperature concerns are probably a factor in this forecast.
 
Back
Top