-
Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!
The last time I've seen a model be as consistent as the GFS and it's ensembles have been, we saw a similar solution at verification time. I think it's possible that this is the way it goes but with at least a little bit of a north correction.
stormcentral said:
Unfortunately, that is what most of the guidance I've seen is pointing to... Even the Euro is not showing the "up to" 3 inches that WRCB is saying. I'm hoping the Hi-Res models save us, but right now I'm having a hard time getting on board with anyone that says more than an inch for CHA. Obviously, things can still change and I hope they do!
EDIT: out of the American models I've seen so far, the NAM 4km is the big winner for Chattanooga with a whopping 0.725"...
ATLWxFan said:WXinCanton said:GFS for ATL
That's meh...unless I'm reading it wrong.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's liquid so 10:1 snow ratio for that area would be roughly 4 1/2 inches of snow I believe is how that works
WXinCanton said:ATLWxFan said:WXinCanton said:GFS for ATL
That's meh...unless I'm reading it wrong.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Almost 5 inches of snow
Am I reading it wrong? I thought it was cumulative.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Got this from our subforum at another site. Very interesting if true.
"GaWx did some research on Lows taking the path of the GFS shows and found it happened once every 10 years since 1950. Last time was Feb 2010. It only happened one time ever with a +AO/NAO which I believe we are in now."
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"GaWx did some research on Lows taking the path of the GFS shows and found it happened once every 10 years since 1950. Last time was Feb 2010. It only happened one time ever with a +AO/NAO which I believe we are in now."
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk