snowlover91
Member
In a nutshell, where the streamlines are running tightly together and then diverge is where you get lift in the upper levels. That causes rising motion throughout the column. Good for storm development, clouds, and precipitation. The stronger the jets, working in tandem, the stronger/more dynamic the storm. You can see a couple distinct jet maxes in the image above.Can you explain what these streamlines mean for the possible winter storm? Does this have to do with the track of the storm, precipitation intensity, or something else?
Not saying this is going to be a repeat of the 2000 Carolina Crusher, but I was trying to recall the forecast with that storm. Was the precip forecasted to stay to our south and miss us?
Also notice the 540 line backing up inland too. Along with the further West track comes the warm nose also. Hopefully the dynamic cooling would be able to do it's thing here. It's always such a fine line to walk in the Eastern Piedmont.
The guidance was much less capable back then. Models showed the storm phasing and strengthening too late and too far out to sea. What the models failed to recognize was that the air was really cold deep into the southeast, and an upper wave developed an area of intense thunderstorm activity developed and raced along the Gulf coast. This cluster of convection added an extra burst of upper level energy at just the right time which essentially accelerated and intensified the storm development much closer to the coast. (This is why I made the joke about wanting to see intense thunderstorm activity in the SE, the other day.) The models failed to recognize that element until the last second. I doubt we'd see that sort of "miss" by the models today. Plus, the same environmental conditions do not exist. But that doesn't mean the models can't still miss the intricate interaction of waves in the two streams, which, at this time, are well within reach of creating a much bigger deal. It will be more of a gradual evolution (like we're seeing), rather than a 12 hour heads-up, most likely.Not saying this is going to be a repeat of the 2000 Carolina Crusher, but I was trying to recall the forecast with that storm. Was the precip forecasted to stay to our south and miss us?
Also notice the 540 line backing up inland too. Along with the further West track comes the warm nose also. Hopefully the dynamic cooling would be able to do it's thing here. It's always such a fine line to walk in the Eastern Piedmont.
uh oh ... dual jet structure ... oh boy☺Hopefully people are paying attention to this, we're getting closer & closer to producing a winter storm around here late Sunday & Monday.
Just watch the 200 hPa evolution on the GFS. Uh oh.
Mods feel free to move this to the other thread.
View attachment 13174
Yep, Fountain said it, but the column will be quite cold, until you get to the surface. Heavier precip should do the trick.Also notice the 540 line backing up inland too. Along with the further West track comes the warm nose also. Hopefully the dynamic cooling would be able to do it's thing here. It's always such a fine line to walk in the Eastern Piedmont.
Where we are heading is obvious, hard not to start feeling optimistic. For central NC folks of courseTo illustrate how these small interactions significantly affect the surface... take a look at the NAM 3 run trend. Impressive shifts.
View attachment 13200
yes it was just like the 2010 storm as well... interesting.
of course 2000 was a long time ago for models haha
View attachment 13202
https://projects.ncsu.edu/atmos_collaboration/nwsfo/storage/cases/20000125/