ragtop50
Member
RAH’s discussion is sticking with 3-5” for the triangle.
I think that is still from the 3:30 AM discussion? I don't see it updated on the NWS site of right now
RAH’s discussion is sticking with 3-5” for the triangle.
It updated. As of 4:10pm.I think that is still from the 3:30 AM discussion? I don't see it updated on the NWS site of right now
No, it is from this afternoon. As of 4:10 Wednesday afternoon.I think that is still from the 3:30 AM discussion? I don't see it updated on the NWS site of right now
For some reason it was still showing the 3:30 a.m. discussion for me, even after I cleared my cache.No, it is from this afternoon. As of 4:10 Wednesday afternoon.
Thanks! That’s actually better than I figured it would be. Definitely not anything quite like the 18z NAM, although certainly a step in the wrong direction for some of us.
At first glance from the 5h look I thought it was going to be an atrocious outcome- pleasantly surprised it was only “sort of worse”.18z RGEM lowers snow totals a little bit again vs 12z run and lowers qpf as well. Not a huge shift though.
Seemed like that NS dug in at the last minute saved Eastern NC.At first glance from the 5h look I thought it was going to be an atrocious outcome- pleasantly surprised it was only “sort of worse”.
it is not one run, all models have trended east since 06z.I am shell shocked at the number of people jumping off the cliff for 1 NAM run. What in the weenieville is this?
That's truly embarrasing. The 12k NAM was HORRIBLE for my area in December 2018 and I've never given it any cred since. It's complete garbage. 3K is better, but come on, this is junk.this was last nights run. just unreal how quick this went to **** in 3 runs.
today: