I’m at 3.9 for the year which is my average… time to start making up for the last few years though…. LolLatest rap looks solid, around 2 inches for Charlotte, some areas around Charlotte by the time this event is over might have 7-10” on the yearView attachment 111081
Man, that color scheme they have makes it look better than it is, haha.NASA Model. Why not, one of these models has to be right ?
NASA Model. Why not, one of these models has to be right ?
Millimeters?? Looks like it must be picking up on fog or a good heavy frost then, .Big reminder; that Nasa model measures in millimeters, not inches, for it's precipitation amounts. You would need about 25 millimeters for 1 inch of liquid precipitation.
That’s gimmick infringement with the Canadian.Big reminder; that Nasa model measures in millimeters, not inches, for it's precipitation amounts. You would need about 25 millimeters for 1 inch of liquid precipitation.
Whichever has most snow is best. It's that simple.That’s gimmick infringement with the Canadian.
I really do wish someone would start tracking these newer models and see which ones are worth their salt.
The ECMWF model's last run showed a hint of it too.Seems like the GFS has been a few hours faster with what band over Charlotte relative to other models.
Would be nice to see this go in the direction of a broad precip shield with enhanced pockets instead of a single band sweeping thru. Keep ticking the wave/trough stronger and getting it to close off would help18z UK likes the super band over near GSO
How sick would that be to get under a 4-6” band.
View attachment 111094
Would be nice to see this go in the direction of a broad precip shield with enhanced pockets instead of a single band sweeping thru. Keep ticking the wave/trough stronger and getting it to close off would help