• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry January 23rd-27th 2026

The euro would be a lot of sleet for the upstate but it does eventually flip to ZR and drops at least 0.5” to 0.75” of accrual. The 850’s flip to warm and we will get a real accrual.
I tend to lean towards a snowier result north of 85 based on history. Models never seem to capture how stubborn the atmosphere can be along and north of 85.
 
A bit of a warning shot, or way to wiggle out of the worse case scenario in North Central Ga., depending on your love or hatred of ice. The wedge is slower to punch into Atlanta/Athens than the past few runs. A nod towards the UKMET/GEM.

After further review, much of this minor difference appears to be because the precip is slightly delayed. Let's roll.
ecmwf_full-sfct_b-imp-conus-2026012012-102.pngecmwf_full-sfct_b-imp-conus-2026012000-114.png
 
How is it more amped with the delay in phasing? Early tilt, which seems off to me?
The baja low still ending up phasing with the northern stream energy. Although IF there are more delays in the baja lows movement then you gotta think phasing may be harder to come by.
 
How is it more amped with the delay in phasing? Early tilt, which seems off to me?
As mentioned by a previous poster, the s/w over the Northern Plains digs a bit more west. This makes the heights over the E CONUS higher. 540 line over PA moved north about 30 miles or so.

Also, it's pretty unlikely we see 100% snow. To get the good stuff, you need to risk mixing in most cases. At minimum, I think we get a great thump (>6") before heavy IP and some ZR
 
[mention]Webberweather53 [/mention] sighting!

Does this thing tick NW… or SE with time?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I mostly lurk and enjoy following the board. Probably a banter post … I am rooting for sleet & snow for obvious reasons. However, there is one member here who, based on his posts, loves sleet. I am hopeful that @dsaur gets that sleet storm he is always hoping for!

With that said, with a deeper cold feed I am guessing the warm air must ride higher up? If so, then maybe more snow/sleet than ZR. I can at least hope. Either way … good luck @dsaur! May the sleet be deep!
 
What's your take so far Webb on amplification and location of miller-B transfer based on all the copious modeling afoot?
[mention]Webberweather53 [/mention] sighting!

Does this thing tick NW… or SE with time?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think it could at the last minute maybe. There’s a risk this one doesn’t do that because of how monstrous the high is that’s backing up the Arctic front. A lot of times these just bully everything in front of them and shift the baroclinic zone south some. Definitely afraid of that over Texas and Oklahoma more than anywhere
 
If you all remember, last year during the great gulf coast blizzard we WANTED the Baja cutoff interaction and it showed it for days and days but in the end no matter how far that kicker out of the NW dug and tried to kiss it, it couldn’t do it. There may be some big time model bias back that way and even in the high likelihood that these two features do interact, we could continue to see that cutoff tick west before doing so.IMG_7755.png
 
That run would be devastating storm for the triangle. 10” of snow and then copious amounts of IP and FZR
I don't think we escape without a historic storm, whichever way this goes. ECMWF's precip algorithm is also off. Pretty much all of our ZR is IP. Sounding attached below. It does get a little warmer at that 700-850 mb range the next couple frames but as that coastal gets going, it will wrap around cold air from the N and W
 

Attachments

  • sounding RDY.jpg
    sounding RDY.jpg
    552.4 KB · Views: 75
This front end thump is like a super charged version of Feb 2014. Way more cold air and way more precip
I can't wait to see your first call map that captures this line of thinking, especially for the Upstate just south of 85. That is only hope of seeing snow, I guess. I have told many to prepare for a damaging ice storm. Praying for sleet to keep the power.
 
Good lord: the model variability for NC is wild.

ICON: ICE ICE BABY
GFS: Full on Blizzard
CMC: ICE and More Ice have some rain to.
AI GFS: Snow Snow and more snow
ECMWF: Warmer and way less snow than the 6z
ECMWF Ensembles: All of it
EC AI: Snow, Ice
UKMET: Dont get me started.

While it is still 3-4 days out, the amount of cold, amount of baja interacting, and amping is a headache for specific precip types. Like throwing a dart.....dont forget the Ensembles are means....some show very little snow and some show shoveling for days. I do not envy forecasters in the south.
 
The models usually struggle with the magnitude of the cold air at the surface until pretty close to the event. They don't have it right yet.

Thoughts from you [mention]Rain Cold [/mention] , plus the Mets here [mention]bouncycorn [/mention] [mention]Webberweather53 [/mention] [mention]jackendrickwx [/mention] and others here….

Often, we say the CAD is underestimated by these models… does that mean cold air at the surface usually trends COLDER than modeled with time? ie… when we get into CAM range?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top