• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Jan. 17-18, 2026 SE Winter Weather Threat

sn10_acc-imp.us_se.png

This is the right RRFS. Still running.
 
CURRENT SNOW CHANCES:
- The highest chance of at least an inch of snow is only at 40-60% for anyone in the Carolinas currently.
- I don't currently buy the EURO model solution of a coastal snow, but it's still possible.
- I expect models to trend warmer, wetter, and further NW between now and Sunday.
- Ice Is still a possibility for many.

Made this map with what I expect to change in the data in mind
That’s a great map and good discussion - very clearly communicated. Good job young blood.
 
Saw somewhere where someone said RRFS follows GFS or something?
The RRFS (like the NAM) is run off the same initial condition as the GFS

Also, the version of the RRFS available on WxBell (FV3 core) was so bad that they are running a new one off the MPAS core
 
Looking at the 6Z/12Z GFS, it looks like the NW trend may be about over for the non-Euro models. Also, the Euro trended NW through yesterday’s 18Z but not since. But with it E of others, it obviously would correct NW on future runs IF it is off.
 
1768492436351.png
Take this with a huge grain of salt. I don't doubt the moisture output, but I highly doubt you're going to get that much snow or that wide of a swath with temps going to struggle. Those of us closer to the mountains have the opportunity to line up the immediate cold escaping the highest elevations and precip. I would think you're going to see the cold hold up a lot more further south and east.
 
One thing annoying about the AI models is how they are only at 6hr increments. I believe that’s because they are partly based on reanalysis data which is in 6hr increments. Anyway, was wondering bouncy (or others) if there will be future efforts to upgrade to 3hr etc?


Update from bouncy in Banter Thread: “Analysis data is available hourly (ERA5), so I’m sure we’ll have hourly-output AINWP models soon. The current models output with a 6hour interval because 6-hour intervals score the highest with the current model architectures used.”
 
Last edited:
Consistent with moisture & warm surface temps.
View attachment 183762ConView attachment 183763

The GFS virtually aligns with it's AI counterpart now when it comes to the axis of heaviest precip. It's the thermals they differ though. The hope at this point for the Atlanta area is that the warm front aloft pushes further NW than modeled(not impossible honestly and happened last year).
 
A little worried about the lack of Northerly wind intensity and colder temps as this system arrives in the Carolina’s. Looks like the mix line will set up right around wake county again with a steep gradient!
 
HUGE BL issues for the Carolinas on pretty much every model....it will be wild if everybody ends up with nothing.
Fairly typical for cold rains here in central NC....one of RainColds rule of thumbs for successful winter events is the cold has to be in place first. We've seen this many many times...
 
Back
Top