VegasEagle
Member
I am seeing a lot of this , this morning.
It's a natural reaction to the erosion of trust in western political leaders and media, who have proven themselves to be more than untrustworthy.Am I allowed to say that I'm disappointed that I'm beginning to see a lot of pro-Russian/Russian apologist sentiment on social media? Sorry if that is too political.
It's a natural reaction to the erosion of trust in western political leaders and media, who have proven themselves to be more than untrustworthy.
War is brutal. I wonder what an objective person would say if WWI, WWIi, the Vietnam War, etc. would have been televised, like this one.
We are pretty much seeing only one side of the story with this current war. And it's brought to you by the same institutions that have not been very dependable or trustworthy when it comes to enhancing our prosperity or furthering truth.
I'm certainly not saying the Russians is good and right, but as a society in general, we have a tendency to rely on what is presented to us rather than think objectively about anything.
It's not that people are inherently pro-Russian. It's mostly that they don't trust the entirety of the narrative we're being fed with all of this.
Not sure of the details but let's see how this plays out
We are desperately wanting to go to war with Russia. I'm not sure why but it's going to be bad for all of us.Uh oh…this wouldn’t be good. I don’t know why we’re calling it a no fly zone, anyways. It’s going to war with Russia, that’s what it is.
Yeah I mean I'm no expert on this topic but, in order to enforce a no-fly zone you must target planes that enter said zone.Uh oh…this wouldn’t be good. I don’t know why we’re calling it a no fly zone, anyways. It’s going to war with Russia, that’s what it is.
$$$$$$. Someone is sitting on the sidelines right now anxious to count some dollars. We have more pressing matters at home that are more relevant to our national security than preoccupying ourselves in another war that benefits the few and depletes the many...We are desperately wanting to go to war with Russia. I'm not sure why but it's going to be bad for all of us.
This seems good:
Obviously those making decisions that will lead to war have no earthly idea what lobbing a bunch of nukes will do, they're worried about environmental issues now, just waitWe are desperately wanting to go to war with Russia. I'm not sure why but it's going to be bad for all of us.
There are many ways to have a Nuclear emergency even without bombs, just getting the power shut off to active plants could potentially do it. You look at Ukraine and all the buildings that will need rebuilt, Roads, infrastructure. Oil and metal into the environment. I mean that will be in the soil forever. It just seems ludicrous to be choosing now as the time to stand up for planet earth and go green. Wouldn't having as minimized a war possible be the best thing we can actually do for the environment?Obviously those making decisions that will lead to war have no earthly idea what lobbing a bunch of nukes will do, they're worried about environmental issues now, just wait
I think it’s inevitable unless Ukraine and Russia come to an agreement.We are desperately wanting to go to war with Russia. I'm not sure why but it's going to be bad for all of us.
Are you seeing many reports of Ukrainian military loses or only those inflicted on civilians? To be sure they have lost a few battles.Am I allowed to say that I'm disappointed that I'm beginning to see a lot of pro-Russian/Russian apologist sentiment on social media? Sorry if that is too political.
This would be beyond stupid. You can create your own no-fly zone munitions.....We are desperately wanting to go to war with Russia. I'm not sure why but it's going to be bad for all of us.
Not sure of the details but let's see how this plays out
Yeah, here is the actual report from Politico, it has more info and obviously nothing that will lead to the no-fly zone. The Kyiv Independent was misleading in their tweet and most likely because this is something they want. These aren't senate or house members or cabinet members, influential persons no doubt, but this letter will not change the stance at this time.I'm not seeing a lot of online chatter or smoke about the 'limited' no fly zone mentioned earlier, which makes me skeptical of how seriously it's being considered at the moment.
I assume those people have no say if it happens or not.This is quite terrible policy. Like who are these 27 foreign policy leaders? Do they not know or understand that a no fly Zone would mean the US/NATO would have to shoot down Russians planes,which would trigger a milliary response from Russia,which mean this becomes WW3. I fully support Ukraine and their fight against Russia don't get me wrong,but what they are calling for is WW3. Even major warmongers like Marco Rubio is against setting up a no Fly Zone.
Posted a link to the article that list those that signed the letter, not anyone that is going to change the policyThis is quite terrible policy. Like who are these 27 foreign policy leaders? Do they not know or understand that a no fly Zone would mean the US/NATO would have to shoot down Russians planes,which would trigger a milliary response from Russia,which mean this becomes WW3. I fully support Ukraine and their fight against Russia don't get me wrong,but what they are calling for is WW3. Even major warmongers like Marco Rubio is against setting up a no Fly Zone.
Gotcha—yea on the surface that looks like an attempt to influence the decision makers.Yeah, here is the actual report from Politico, it has more info and obviously nothing that will lead to the no-fly zone. The Kyiv Independent was misleading in their tweet and most likely because this is something they want. These aren't senate or house members or cabinet members, influential persons no doubt, but this letter will not change the stance at this time.
https://www.politico.com/newsletter...ins-steam-among-foreign-policy-elite-00015004
Nobody wants WW3 but just imagine if good nations never drew a line in the sand in the 1940s? How many dead Jews is too many? How many dead Ukranians are too many? What good is it to stand for the good of humanity if you never confront those doing inhumanity to others?This is quite terrible policy. Like who are these 27 foreign policy leaders? Do they not know or understand that a no fly Zone would mean the US/NATO would have to shoot down Russians planes,which would trigger a milliary response from Russia,which mean this becomes WW3. I fully support Ukraine and their fight against Russia don't get me wrong,but what they are calling for is WW3. Even major warmongers like Marco Rubio is against setting up a no Fly Zone.
Nobody wants WW3 but just imagine if good nations never drew a line in the sand in the 1940s? How many dead Jews is too many? How many dead Ukranians are too many? What good is it to stand for the good of humanity if you never confront those doing inhumanity to others?
These are all.tough questions to answer on a geopolitical scale
North Korea rings a bell. The people will suffer but the ones in power will not.Just a question for anyone who may know. What will happen when Russias economy completely defaults and shatters? What will be the impact to Russia and to the rest of the world?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
North Korea rings a bell. The people will suffer but the ones in power will not.