I haven't watched it, but i bet he's going straight Nina. Probably below average snow for the SE. Is that right?
All signs point to us being in good shape with the push into the Western Hemisphere IMO (Phase 7-8-1). There's a nice removal of the uplift / convective signal in the Maritime Continent (green neg VP) showing up here on the Euro Wk from mid-Nov into early DecGriteater, will the mjo wave have to be strong enough to make it to the colder phases in your opinion?

Is it fair to say that if the amplitude is higher though the various locations that it takes longer to make the orbit? Like, in this case, if we see a higher amplitude wave, is it possible we remain in favorable phases through Christmas, rather than heading into P3+ by Christmas if is a lower amplitude? I would assume a higher amplitude usually takes longer, but maybe it moves faster, so in the end it may not matter. That's probably a really dumb post, but I'm not that smart, so we'll just have to live with it.Over the past 12 days, the trend on the forecast of the Euro Monthly ensemble members has been for an increasing amplitude of the MJO wave as it pushes into Phase 7 (green dots)
View attachment 176401
I think larger amplitude resulting in slower movement sounds logical and believe I've heard that correlation before, but not sure of it. Maybe Webb or others can help with that....but Webb has mentioned that Ninas are known for slower moving MJO waves. Ninos more easily carry the signal east out of the Maritime Continent whereas there are typically westward propagating waves during La Ninas (more common to have easterly low-level winds along the equator in the Pacific) that can slow the MJO's eastward progression. In my mind, we have an ideal scenario at the moment of the MJO wave being slowed down along the way thru 5 and 6, and not racing thru 7 at the moment in the forecasts. We need the slow down so that it's not racing thru the good phases in early Dec. The slower the better of course thru 7-8-1-2Is it fair to say that if the amplitude is higher though the various locations that it takes longer to make the orbit? Like, in this case, if we see a higher amplitude wave, is it possible we remain in favorable phases through Christmas, rather than heading into P3+ by Christmas if is a lower amplitude? I would assume a higher amplitude usually takes longer, but maybe it moves faster, so in the end it may not matter. That's probably a really dumb post, but I'm not that smart, so we'll just have to live with it.
What I am really trying to say is I want it in the good phases around Christmas so it will snow on my house and be cold around the holidays and I dont care about anything else. TIA!

I think larger amplitude resulting in slower movement sounds logical and believe I've heard that correlation before, but not sure of it. Maybe Webb or others can help with that....but Webb has mentioned that Ninas are known for slower moving MJO waves. Ninos more easily carry the signal east out of the Maritime Continent whereas there are typically westward propagating waves during La Ninas (more common to have west low-level winds along the equator in the Pacific) that can slow the MJO's eastward progression. In my mind, we have an ideal scenario at the moment of the MJO wave being slowed down along the way thru 5 and 6, and not racing thru 7 at the moment in the forecasts. We need the slow down so that it's not racing thru the good phases in early Dec. The slower the better of course thru 7-8-1-2
View attachment 176416
The last SSW event happened in 1958* (rather than '68 as the post says) but it is to be noted that this event yielded large amounts of snow across NC and SC just a week and a half later on December 11.
Raleigh got 9 inches, and areas of Nash County NC got nearly 20 inches. Columbia saw 8.8 inches as well.
This should be fun to track if all goes to plan.
Oh wow! I stand corrected lol.Actually both 1968 and 1958 had a late Nov SSWE:
What a time it must have beenThat’s the last time Fayetteville has seen a foot of snow in a single storm, insane it’s been that long.
My grandfather who passed away a little over month ago told me about this storm when he was stationed in Fort Bragg for basic training. He said he has not seen that much snow in Fayetteville since then (& he would be right).
Is it fair to say that if the amplitude is higher though the various locations that it takes longer to make the orbit? Like, in this case, if we see a higher amplitude wave, is it possible we remain in favorable phases through Christmas, rather than heading into P3+ by Christmas if is a lower amplitude? I would assume a higher amplitude usually takes longer, but maybe it moves faster, so in the end it may not matter. That's probably a really dumb post, but I'm not that smart, so we'll just have to live with it.
What I am really trying to say is I want it in the good phases around Christmas so it will snow on my house and be cold around the holidays and I dont care about anything else. TIA!
You remembered right. I'm hoping for a repeat of 2013-14 as well. Definitely a huge win for us getting snow this early in November and 2013-14 was a great winter compared to recent winters.If I remember well, it snowed overnight two nights before Thanskgiving in ATL in 2013. We had Janurary 28th snow storm and then the Feb snow/sleet/ice storm in Feb 14. It was a very active winter. Atlanta saw flurries today. This might be a copy of the '13-'14 winter.
Also, the 2010-2011... it snowed Christmas day 2010, and we had convective snow the nexf day (26th). January (either 8-11th, one of them days), 2011 is snowed turning into sleet on top. In fact, it snowed the next day I believe because a upper low level swing through. I think it snowed alittle in Feb of that year too! I think a dusting in ATLYou remembered right. I'm hoping for a repeat of 2013-14 as well. Definitely a huge win for us getting snow this early in November and 2013-14 was a great winter compared to recent winters.
Definitely well done. Explained things in a way where most could understand.This is a fantastic write up. The smarter people have spoken about this.
![]()
Polar Vortex Watch: A Stratospheric Warming event is about to start, with Cold Weather and Snow to follow behind
A Stratospheric Warming event will disrupt the Polar Vortex, bringing cold weather and snow into the United States, Canada in Decemberwww.severe-weather.eu




Is that good or bad?Here's the last 90 days worth of mountain torque and updated atmospheric angular momentum (AAM) anomalies.
Notice the near-continuous bouts of positive E Asia Mountain Torque since the middle of October (red line top image) while global atmospheric angular momentum has become positive (black line bottom image).
The MJO provides the westerly momentum in the form of irrotational outflow anomalies, while E Asia Mountain Torque (via successive cold highs descending down into China) effectively "squeezes" & focuses this westerly momentum in the tropics. Hence, the big increase in westerly wind anomalies in the tropics as shown earlier.
Even if the MJO doesn't reach the Western Hemisphere (it almost certainly will), this is just another reason why I've been skeptical of a -PNA in early December, because the global tropics have been legitimately becoming more El Niño like here, which inherently favors a more extended Pacific Jet & +PNA.
View attachment 176468
View attachment 176469
Is that good or bad?
Is that good or bad?
I am okay with that because that will change tomorrowToday’s Euro Weeklies for Dec 1-21 are still showing consistent strong cold largely avoiding the SE due to a neutral PNA to -PNA not driving the coldest anomalies far into the SE. The Midwest to N Rockies are where the coldest anomalies remain concentrated.
I am okay with thar because that will change tomorrow
In all seriousness, it’s a step down process! We are getting warnings shots of cold here finally, but no staying power! Highs Sunday were in the 20s and by this Friday and Saturday, will be right at 70.Today’s Euro Weeklies for Dec 1-21 are still showing consistent strong cold largely avoiding the SE due to a neutral PNA to -PNA not driving the coldest anomalies far into the SE. The Midwest to N Rockies are where the coldest anomalies remain concentrated.


Even if this verified, NN isn’t mild! But the maps for Dec 1-21 continue to not have a persistent +PNA as it looks on average neutral to -PNA. With that, it’s harder to get all that cold in the SE, especially deeper SE. But yes, the maps always change for better or for worse!





I don't want to see the pna too positive or see it too negative. That's why it's very difficult to get winter weather in the southAllan Huffman going with a cold January in the E US and a NN overall DJF in the SE: I wonder if this is because of a prog for a very early SSWE followed by a lagged cold effect in Jan:
View attachment 176485
I’d be quite content with this. Not having a warmer than normal La Niña winter in the majority of the SE including another cold Jan would be a victory!
Allan Huffman going with a cold January in the E US and a NN overall DJF in the SE: I wonder if this is because of a prog for a very early SSWE followed by a lagged cold effect in Jan:
View attachment 176485
I’d be quite content with this. Not having a warmer than normal La Niña winter in the majority of the SE including another cold Jan would be a victory!
Better get her done late December or early toI don't want to see the pna too positive or see it too negative. That's why it's very difficult to get winter weather in the south