Don't think my gif uploaded well but can definitely see a better H5 look.Umm NAM looks wayyyyyyy different at 78 than 12z. Woah...
Leave it to the NAM to take the same data it had, ingest some new, and spit out an entirely different look @ H5 vs 12z.
I know how you feel now. I was being unrealistic about the last system, and now these people are clearly in denial about the trend, and the poorness of the setup in general. It's more likely than not we won't get anything out of this and the next system will be just rain since that seems to pretty much always be a guarantee, assuming the cold air won't last too long because the Pacific is so damn fast, we have no high latitude blocking, and no southern California shortwave to bring in copious moisture to match up with cold in time. I agree. Let's just face reality now and stop leaving in a fantasy world. This is just the sad reality for snow lovers in the SE.Lol heaven forbid people have different opinions.
Let's change the forum to where everyone has to agree and be unrealistic. Good idea
Sent from my SM-J320VPP using Tapatalk
Depends.The NAM is pants bursting good for us Central Alabama folks !
If I can see the HRRR on board and the RGEM, I'll go all in. We got the NAM now, and the Euro hasn't been up to par recently. Seems to be taking the drugs that the GFS and CMC like to.And the NAM gives us life. The short range models did do well with the last storm.
I don't blame you man. I wouldn't trust the bait the NAM is throwing out now as far as Earth is from the moon!I don't trust the NAM at all, but given how everything has gone recently, I give it 1% of my trust. Just 1. If more and more models look like it, I'll give it 1.1%. I hope we see more like it, since that would really mean snow here. Basically, what it's showing at 10:1, could be realistic. Don't go extreme with 20:1 as the NAM overdoes QPF.
It is the start of the reverse trend. Lol. Everything will trend better now. (Happy throughts) lolNAM rocks and says "what bad trend".
![]()
Don't take the bait and go on this rollercoaster again. I wouldn't even think of putting much stock in that as of right now anyway given how fickle the setup is in general and models all over the place. Please take with a grain of salt so u won't be disappointed if it changes again.And the NAM gives us life. The short range models did do well with the last storm.
Yeah, the NA< did good with the Dec 9 storm here. Probably one of the best. GFS was stubborn, CMC was okay, and the Euro wasn't quite right. The NAM didn't do good last few events because it was mostly fringe regions it was bad in. I think that if you are in the NAM's target area, you have a chance. Assuming it doesn't all poof in 4 runs.Wow at the negative people on here. Remember, the NAM even when it was the outlier has done great several events over the last year.
Also seems to be very weak low level circulation over northern GOM
Once again, right on the WRONG edge of the snow line
No kidding great look.18z NAM would probably be a huge NC hit. We will see how it looks inside of 60 hours tomorrow.
Once again, right on the WRONG edge of the snow line
View attachment 2805 What is unreal about this is the air temp. Low - mid 20’s when the precip starts. Unreal. You don’t see that much in the south.
Also looks better than yesterday's 12z GFS.
Very nice write up delta...Ok so let's talk disclaimer first. Lol it's the NAM blah blah blah I know and agree
***I would argue that there is a very real possibility we could see a weak sfc reflection with a low under that awesome dual jet structure. Even if we don't, imho it won't take much more to have more moisture and qpf.
View attachment 2807 View attachment 2808 View attachment 2809 View attachment 2810