Gotcha.... lol ok slow down then, 50 miles a day and it'll be too far NW
Because they are 24 hr frames and it's comparing same validation time.
I’m dumb ....???

Gotcha.... lol ok slow down then, 50 miles a day and it'll be too far NW
Because they are 24 hr frames and it's comparing same validation time.
Not hardly but I will say it felt good to know one thing you didn't lolI’m dumb ....???![]()
Yeah with a handful of members just off the coast..... are we the only one's actually still following this? LolGEPS took a step in the right direction
View attachment 17052
No, I'm following too. I just don't have much to add. When a system is suppressed to the SE and you are 100 hours out, you are still in the game. Good trends with the 12z suite with regards to the west extension of the PV in Canada. My guess is it could still miss us and the MA, but swipe Boston and Nantucket. That seems to happen once a year.Yeah with a handful of members just off the coast..... are we the only one's actually still following this? Lol
Yeah with a handful of members just off the coast..... are we the only one's actually still following this? Lol
weird, eps took a seemingly better step by slowing down the L/W trough yet the LP position/low itself this run look more like crap
I couldn’t agree with you more. I’d have so much snow if the ensembles came even close to verifying. And the gfs is also useless and so far behind the euro. After showing some good improvements for a few runs the 12z gfs of course came in with its worse run yet and completely caved to the euro again.I really have found ensembles to be useless this year. I mean what are they really good for? You can see how many solutions are north vs south? Amp’d vs strung out? Cold vs hot? Ok. But what good are they when they change from run to run just like an operational model? I’ve been in the 5” snow mean inside 200hr 5 times this winter and I have an inch of sleet to show for it. Change my mind
View attachment 17041
I really have found ensembles to be useless this year. I mean what are they really good for? You can see how many solutions are north vs south? Amp’d vs strung out? Cold vs hot? Ok. But what good are they when they change from run to run just like an operational model? I’ve been in the 5” snow mean inside 200hr 5 times this winter and I have an inch of sleet to show for it. Change my mind
View attachment 17041
I couldn’t agree with you more. I’d have so much snow if the ensembles came even close to verifying. And the gfs is also useless and so far behind the euro. After showing some good improvements for a few runs the 12z gfs of course came in with its worse run yet and completely caved to the euro again.
The ensembles have been just as bad, if not worse, than the op runs this winter with showing snow that never happened.
CMC ensembles hours 96 and 108, looks like a nice little improvement.
View attachment 17057
View attachment 17056
That’s definitely not bad, gefs kinda similar aswell
It's kind of hard to get a NW trend w/ our coastal when the longwave trough axis keeps speeding up. We really needed to go back to the runs from yesterday and trend the other way to have a shot, the opposite happened on this suite. I liked where we were potentially headed into the 12z models but we have an extremely steep hill to climb to get a glimmer of hope back.
We can't do anything right this winter after the Dec storm.
Just wanna say thanks for hanging with us man, great post."...we have an extremely steep hill to climb to get a glimmer of hope back."
Ironically, several cycles removed from this suite, we've definitely been going back in the right direction to seeing a storm during the middle of next week, the hill isn't as steep as it was yesterday afternoon but it's still pretty menacing.
Remember from one of my posts yesterday morning that the shortwave over the Lakes and Upper midwest needs to slow down &/or dig a little further southwestward towards the central Great Plains again causing height rises off the SE US coast to give us a chance for a storm here.
We still have a lot of work left to do, but if the base of this positively trough/vortex complex can slow down a little more and dig southwestward to about Iowa by 0z Wed, we'd be in good shape. The clock is ticking but we have 4 days left to get that look on the models, still plenty of time imho.
View attachment 17060
Just wanna say thanks for hanging with us man, great post.
I seen that also.Did the euro show something at the end of the run for NC? Looks interesting for overrunning potential
LOL we keep on ticking in the right direction, who knows what could happenGfs with the positive trend aswell, even has some light precip in NC, this just goes to show how these little changes with H5 mean so much to this storm, we’re getting out of that NW flow
View attachment 17065
This is the reason for precip breaking out in NC, stronger energy
View attachment 17066
Sure it’s light still but it’s definitely improving
What else is it clutteringShould we create a storm thread for this coastal so we don’t clutter the March thread with this storm lol, Idc if this fails, I just feel like I’m cluttering up this thread