• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Tropical Major Hurricane Laura

LovingGulfLows said:
Not at all....in fact I would say nothing was as bad as you would expect of a hurricane that neared Cat 5 status. In fact, everything felt more like a low-mid Cat 3 storm.
Click to expand...
I mean it's still early but indications seem to be this was nowhere near a cat 4, much less a high end cat 4.
 
I think the southern eye wall looking like it was opening. Or maybe a little touch of dry air. Right before landfall really helped out in weakening it. Just my opinion


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The storm went a bit east of the predicted high impact areas and the eye was pretty large so fortunately the marsh took the brunt of it. Its just not comparable to when a coastal town or resort area with tons of impervious takes a hit. Doesn't mean the storm was not powerful. You really have to allow the damage to be surveyed a bit, they probably have not accessed the hardest hit areas. This was fortunate placement for the storm to come in.
 
Nobody is pointing fingers here at all, as suggested above. I'm sure the marshes mitigated the surge to some degree, maybe greatly. The meteorologists and hydrologists know all of this and still predicted a massive surge into Lake Charles and well beyond, that apparently did not happen hardly at all. That, by definition, is a bust. I'm fascinated by the science behind this. I'm certainly not disappointed. More info will come through the days and weeks ahead and certainly, the immediate coast is going to be horrible.
 
NWTENN said:
First, I am thrilled that, at least preliminarily, Laura's damage looks to be minimal, all things considered. I'm sure the immediate coast will be worse than what we're seeing out of Lake Charles and any loss of life/property is bad. I'm very thankful the surge wasn't the 15-20 ft forecast and is more like 5' (Lake Charles). Very good news for that city!! My concerns are, how can they miss surge forecast that bad? And, this type of thing sure feeds the "cry wolf" syndrome. "Unsurvivable storm surge" that didn't happen at all. I don't think it was overhyped; I just think it's a busted forecast. A real demonstration that we really don't know as much about storm surge as we think we do. Sometimes, they nail the surge forecast... on this one? It **looks** like a terrible miss, albeit for the good.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I agree about the boy crying wolf syndrome. Next time some people may be be liable to say, "last time they predicted 15-20' of surge we barely got 5' and refuse to evacuate, and then that 15-20' does actually materialize and they get washed away.

What caused the miss, anyways? I guess the storm came in a little east, but nowhere received the 15-20' of surge as far as I can tell. The storm itself was as powerful as progged. Are storm surge predictions just that inaccurate?
 
Dewpoint Dan said:
I mean it's still early but indications seem to be this was nowhere near a cat 4, much less a high end cat 4.
Click to expand...
Based on what? OBS from weather stations almost never confirms stronger hurricanes, this is nothing new. Winds won't be quite as strong over water, and the stronger winds will tend to know out OBS stations.
 
People always jump to conclusions after a few damage reports and videos sprinkle in. I remember that happening with Michael and then when people finally got access to the hardest hit areas people realized how bad it was once those pictures started streaming in. Also keep in mind the NE/E eyewall went over sparsely populated areas (which is good) where there weren't any weather stations to reliably gauge the wind. I expect we will see some eye opening damage coming in later today and tomorrow as damage assessment begins.
 
LovingGulfLows said:
Not at all....in fact I would say nothing was as bad as you would expect of a hurricane that neared Cat 5 status. In fact, everything felt more like a low-mid Cat 3 storm.
Click to expand...

Well that's a technicality. Did a tsunami rush inland 30 miles? Of course not but Lake Charles did record a 5 or 6 foot surge so In reality they are 30 to 40 miles inland.
 
superjames1992 said:
Yeah, I agree about the boy crying wolf syndrome. Next time some people may be be liable to say, "last time they predicted 15-20' of surge we barely got 5' and refuse to evacuate, and then that 15-20' does actually materialize and they get washed away.
Click to expand...

I fail to see how it's the mets fault that people don't think things through before making the life-threatening decision to stay put during a major hurricane. The forecasters do the best they can with the data they have. As always, I'm sure that this will be a learning experience that will allow them to further refine future predictions. That's just how science works. If people want to disregard the experts completely because of something like this then that's on them. You can't fix stupid.
 
Is the center of Hurricane Laura now moving northeast? I assumed it’d still be moving north at this point. Thoughts?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top