• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry Machine Learning Mauler 1/30-2/1

Iirc @bouncycorn said once that the AI models don't always slowly shift but if changes arise, make a big jump and kinda lock in. Something along those lines, anyway, seems Google AI did that. One big adjustment and locked, maybe?
 
Iirc @bouncycorn said once that the AI models don't always slowly shift but if changes arise, make a big jump and kinda lock in. Something along those lines, anyway, seems Google AI did that. One big adjustment and locked, maybe?
yeah probably, its just really really funny that the GFS was closer than it
 
The handling of the coastal is intriguing. Rather than the coastal pumping moisture inland it seems we are getting a hybrid setup where the ULL starts to interact with the coastal and enhance the moisture stretching back towards the deepening low. The obvious fail here is if webbers dry slot appears and this is more of a handoff rather than an enhancement.
 
The handling of the coastal is intriguing. Rather than the coastal pumping moisture inland it seems we are getting a hybrid setup where the ULL starts to interact with the coastal and enhance the moisture stretching back towards the deepening low. The obvious fail here is if webbers dry slot appears and this is more of a handoff rather than an enhancement.
This trend of precip shows a precip max developing over western nc and another in eastern nc. A steadier but slightly less amount over central nc seems reasonable. Hopefully the models continue to latch onto this enhanced look rather than precip maxes handing off to one another
 
The handling of the coastal is intriguing. Rather than the coastal pumping moisture inland it seems we are getting a hybrid setup where the ULL starts to interact with the coastal and enhance the moisture stretching back towards the deepening low. The obvious fail here is if webbers dry slot appears and this is more of a handoff rather than an enhancement.
Need the coastal to form nc/sc border or south. If it forms due east of us it has to go super bomb to wrap all the way back in time before it's too far north
 
The handling of the coastal is intriguing. Rather than the coastal pumping moisture inland it seems we are getting a hybrid setup where the ULL starts to interact with the coastal and enhance the moisture stretching back towards the deepening low. The obvious fail here is if webbers dry slot appears and this is more of a handoff rather than an enhancement.
December 2010 was an example of a "hand off". Different setup, whereas Charlotte and southwestward should do better this time, but this drier zone can happen.

1769606609004.png
 
The handling of the coastal is intriguing. Rather than the coastal pumping moisture inland it seems we are getting a hybrid setup where the ULL starts to interact with the coastal and enhance the moisture stretching back towards the deepening low. The obvious fail here is if webbers dry slot appears and this is more of a handoff rather than an enhancement.
The euro and gfs ai models are showing an initial dry slot over the Sandhills north atm. It backfills but initially is slotted.
 
December 2010 was an example of a "hand off". Different setup, whereas Charlotte and southwestward should do better this time, but this drier zone can happen.

View attachment 190506
I'm fairly certain, unless something changes, you can shift that east and slightly NE about 2-3 rows of counties.
 
It seems like models are coming into 2 general consensus points

1. ULL is going to produce a decent snow in western NC and SC. This seems to be happening regardless

2. The global models and short range for the most part are showing a low pressure developing to the south and riding very close to the gulf stream. This SHOULD keep most of the area snow. OBX may see some mixing but the question is: how fast does it bomb? Faster bombing means more QPF and a faster influx of cold air at all levels on the Western Side. GFS is most extreme with this, EURO/RGM/NAM/Google and even the ICON now seem to be similar but not as amped as the GFS. I do have questions regarding the GFS solution of this low bombing and meandering off of NC/VA for 12-18 hours.

We are getting closer to go time. Todays 12z runs will be very telling.
 
Based on? A hunch?
Based on:

-Global models inability to properly place ULL’s
-2.5 days worth of westward trends that coincide with how these setups dig way further west and south as they approach more often than not
-NAM and RGEM already showing this with expanded qpf fields when they are normally very dry at this range
-Increased heights off the east coast
-Trends showing increased interaction with energy in the SW

Need more?
 
NWS must be thinking 3:1 ratios are happening??? lol

I'm sorry, but this is pathetic. It's just a wishcast for less snow essentially. no guidance supports this. Is it their job to mislead the public?

Edit: just saw it's only through 7am Saturday, so nevermind. Haha
When you take the average of huge storms and zeros, like the NWS often does with the uncertainty at this stage, the 'forecast' is sometimes the least likely to happen.
 
The handling of the coastal is intriguing. Rather than the coastal pumping moisture inland it seems we are getting a hybrid setup where the ULL starts to interact with the coastal and enhance the moisture stretching back towards the deepening low. The obvious fail here is if webbers dry slot appears and this is more of a handoff rather than an enhancement.
yep, been watching that precip divot on the models
 
I'm fairly certain, unless something changes, you can shift that east and slightly NE about 2-3 rows of counties.
We're still looking good. The AI models are not great for my location over to your place. But the GIS ai did bump up the QPF some for us. Hopefully that can continue at 12z:

1769607770661.png
Honestly, 5-6" would be a win for me.
 
We're still looking good. The AI models are not great for my location over to your place. But the GIS ai did bump up the QPF some for us. Hopefully that can continue at 12z:

View attachment 190512
Honestly, 5-6" would be a win for me.

Google looks really good for our location


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
We're still looking good. The AI models are not great for my location over to your place. But the GIS ai did bump up the QPF some for us. Hopefully that can continue at 12z:

View attachment 190512
Honestly, 5-6" would be a win for me.
Well it's slight but even on the 3 run trend of the NBM you can start to see amounts increase W/SW and the dry slot slowly inch north. Subtle but there
1769608061617.gif
 
We're still looking good. The AI models are not great for my location over to your place. But the GIS ai did bump up the QPF some for us. Hopefully that can continue at 12z:


Honestly, 5-6" would be a win for me.

Wow, GFS AI with 0.2" up to Atlanta. I'm not even gonna do ratio math, but that's a decent shift that snuck up on me.
 
Google looks really good for our location


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And other models as well. We (weather weenies) always focus on the worse models and the worse possible outcome. Which is part of the game.
 
6Z RGEM, still snowing over north GA.

snku_acc-imp.us_se.png
Considering the 0z Canadian had the snow not ending in eastern areas until sat after 0z, the rgem is a big hit for north ga. I hope the 12z run is consistent.
 
We're used to it. If the warm nose doesn't get us, the dry slot will.
This is life along 95/the fall line. It always happens here. There are very few wintry weather events I can remember where MBY wasn't either in a precip hole or along the 10 mile wide razor edge transition of snow/sleet/rain. Or we will get sleet with a light dusting at the end of the event while points 20 miles north/west get all snow. I'm hopeful for a good performer out of this system but also trying to keep expectations realistic.
 
GFS has been consistent for like 7-8 straight runs

View attachment 190478

I’d be very wary about the crazy high qpf of the last several GFS over C and E NC. It had 2-4” of qpf for the previous storm in many areas like ATL and much of N GA ended up with only ~0.75”. I’d at least cut the GFS’ in half. Besides we know it is an inferior model in general. Compare the GFS crazy high qpf to the other models and it isn’t really close for the most part:

GFS way out on limb:
IMG_7652.png

Euro: way less than GFS
IMG_7653.png

CMC: much less than GFS except within 75 miles of coast:
IMG_7654.png

ICON: way less than GFS
IMG_7655.png

UKMET: way less than others/likely way underdone
IMG_7656.png

I’d favor going with the middle ground combo of Euro and Icon as of now for overall qpf amounts and favor the Euro’s C NC for the heaviest at this point.
 
Well it's slight but even on the 3 run trend of the NBM you can start to see amounts increase W/SW and the dry slot slowly inch north. Subtle but there
View attachment 190514
I expect that to drop some more (especially for us) once the GFS comes down to reality.
 
Hopefully this is better
View attachment 187010

I’d be very wary about the crazy high qpf of the last several GFS over C and E NC. It had 2-4” of qpf for the previous storm in many areas like ATL and much of N GA ended up with only ~0.75”. I’d at least cut the GFS’ in half. Besides we know it is an inferior model in general. Compare the GFS crazy high qpf to the other models and it isn’t really close for the most part:

GFS way out on limb:
View attachment 190515

Euro: way less than GFS
View attachment 190516

CMC: much less than GFS except within 75 miles of coast:
View attachment 190517

ICON: way less than GFS
View attachment 190518

UKMET: way less than others/likely way underdone
View attachment 190519

I’d favor going with the middle ground combo of Euro and Icon as of now for overall qpf amounts and favor the Euro’s C NC for the heaviest at this point.
Especially since the GFS output is the Low basically stalling/meandering off NC/VA for 12-18 hours. No other model show is getting captured. They show gradual NE movement not a crawl
 
I’d be very wary about the crazy high qpf of the last several GFS over C and E NC. It had 2-4” of qpf for the previous storm in many areas like ATL and much of N GA ended up with only ~0.75”. I’d at least cut the GFS’ in half. Besides we know it is an inferior model in general. Compare the GFS crazy high qpf to the other models and it isn’t really close for the most part:

GFS way out on limb:
View attachment 190515

Euro: way less than GFS
View attachment 190516

CMC: much less than GFS except within 75 miles of coast:
View attachment 190517

ICON: way less than GFS
View attachment 190518

UKMET: way less than others/likely way underdone
View attachment 190519

I’d favor going with the middle ground combo of Euro and Icon as of now for overall qpf amounts and favor the Euro’s C NC for the heaviest at this point.
Probably correct but most of the western piedmont is from the ull, correct? The qpf letdown has been from surface lows. If we can get the neutral to negative tilt to occur, I would expect decent returns.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top