BHS1975
Member
No way to sugar coat it, not a good run!
We toss
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No way to sugar coat it, not a good run!
Whats funny is the sfc low is closer to the coast yet less precip....ya....there is no easy way to say this, but what changes on the NAM both 12km and 3km and not in a good way....NAM=FAIL this run for sure.With the later phase, the pull is not as pronounced NW this run...inverted trough is still there, but less warm nosing apparent with a thinner transitional line...
That’s semantics. The bottom line is, the early phase that the Nam was showing that was absent on all the other models is gone. That tells me that the Nam was probably wrong. That isn’t Debbie Downer. It’s just an unfortunate fact.Agreed. It would be more accurate to say that the nam took a step towards the other models.
Whats funny is the sfc low is closer to the coast yet less precip....ya....there is no easy way to say this, but what changes on the NAM both 12km and 3km and not in a good way....NAM=FAIL this run for sure.
in NC it's all about sfc lp track. Yea a super jacked up lp is nice but a weaker one hugging the SC coast and on a more north trajectory will get enough qpf to whiten the brown ground.Actually 3km is good for NC and thats about it...even GA and SC coastlines...forget about inland GA and SC this run
Last frame is the newest. Much further East with precip shield for GA/SC especially. This is like 4 NAM runs.
Yep a good run and highlights the snow 9n the NW side much better.I'm riding the 3k NAM to glory or the glorious cliff...
I hope it works for y'all for sureYep a good run and highlights the snow 9n the NW side much better.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Wow, that's a huge shift East. How depressing.Last frame is the newest. Much further East with precip shield for GA/SC especially. This is like 4 NAM runs.
Looks great, 5" where I live and still3k nam looks great for the eastern nc Piedmont. Some totals over a foot. Over 10” for Raleigh. We toss?