Cary_Snow95
Member

This is just mesmerizing
After what was showing a few days ago, I'll take an avg to a few degrees below normal, and call it a win! General consensus is the brutal cold gets to the EC a day or two after Christmas
GFS done this before with super suppression on systems moving out of Gulf but seen that not exactly play out
Just another friendly reminder of the GFS's cold bias near day 7... Take it w/ a mine of salt
View attachment 2121
Just another friendly reminder of the GFS's cold bias near day 7... Don't let your own personal cold/snowy biases get in the way of objectivity, take it w/ a mine of salt. Odds are this 18z run is probably overdone
View attachment 2121
Yeah, any precip will be absolutely squashed this run during this push. Fun to see!
These are highs or lows ?Save this run. We won’t see another like it anytime soon![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I realize that this is likely overdone but...it's not just the GFS that is throwing around wacky high pressures like this. I guess we need to throw out every model that is showing it.
Webb,I realize that the pattern is favorable for a monstrous shot of arctic air but a) this is one run of the GFS b) it's the 18z suite, which doesnt include upper air data c) it has a cold bias in the medium range d) other models (like the ECMWF) are not as enthused e) it's a climatologically unusual shot of arctic air verbatim, it's hard to get that kind of airmass even back in the 20th and 19th centuries when the climate was cooler, there's a good reason the contiguous US MSLP record high is only 1064 hPa...
Until 0z!Save this run. We won’t see another like it anytime soon![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I realize that the pattern is favorable for a monstrous shot of arctic air but a) this is one run of the GFS b) it's the 18z suite, which doesnt include upper air data c) it has a cold bias in the medium range d) other models (like the ECMWF) are not as enthused e) it's a climatologically unusual shot of arctic air verbatim, it's hard to get that kind of airmass even back in the 20th and 19th centuries when the climate was cooler, there's a good reason the contiguous US MSLP record high is only 1064 hPa... Anything showing a high over 1060 mb is probably outlandish for now
1899 had a 1062 drop into Montana! It happens, Phil may have been there!I realize that the pattern is favorable for a monstrous shot of arctic air but a) this is one run of the GFS b) it's the 18z suite, which doesnt include upper air data c) it has a cold bias in the medium range d) other models (like the ECMWF) are not as enthused e) it's a climatologically unusual shot of arctic air verbatim, it's hard to get that kind of airmass even back in the 20th and 19th centuries when the climate was cooler, there's a good reason the contiguous US MSLP record high is only 1064 hPa... Anything showing a high over 1060 mb is probably outlandish for now
I'm admittedly the Curmudgeon, but not that old ...1899 had a 1062 drop into Montana! It happens, Phil may have been there!![]()
...there was a run that was even more outrageous than this recently by the GFS cold air wise, and it was not the Happy Hour run either, it was one of the runs with fresh data...
...there was a run that was even more outrageous than this recently by the GFS cold air wise, and it was not the Happy Hour run either, it was one of the runs with fresh data...
not really... if its not going snow... cold dry to most is boring... rather be shirtless and flip flops on christmasOnly hope for precip is when the initial front moves in and is pressing up against the SE ridge with a SW . Other than that is squash city . I’d be happy with cold and dry . Beats a warm christmas
Start the threadAlmost![]()
![]()
![]()
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk