• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Coronavirus (Stay on Topic)

Status
Not open for further replies.
As I have said, I think masks can be effective. But there are medical professionals who disagree. I don't think it's a bad thing to try and understand that point of view.

That’s exactly all I’m saying. I’m not saying anything to the sort of banning any opposite thoughts or thoughts against mainstream beliefs, but usually these thoughts are in the form of screenshots of unsourced social media images or articles from known (or unknown), far-right conspiracy theory websites/blogs. It must just be a coincidence? It’s hard to know what to trust these days, as just because someone’s an MD doesn’t mean I trust them and neither should any of you. Some MDs can literally be cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs.

I just feel like we can make a better argument and open up an actual dialogue with a reputable source, that’s my take. Masks aren’t perfect but I don’t think they were ever meant to be.

The case study here, involving the fully symptomatic hairdressers not spreading it to over 100 clients in close contact is basically where I stand on masks. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/pdfs/mm6928e2-H.pdf
 
This is a mixture of politics and virus, so I’ll just put it here.

"If I'm victorious on November 3rd, I plan to forgive these taxes and make permanent cuts to the payroll tax," ?
 
So, I guess the debt that we're in is supposed to just continuously roll over until our children and grandchildren are supposed to pay for it? Because that debt is just not going to go in the wind even if we want to wish it into the wind.

That's not that I like taxes as I know I won't when I'm paying. But...
 
This is a mixture of politics and virus, so I’ll just put it here.

"If I'm victorious on November 3rd, I plan to forgive these taxes and make permanent cuts to the payroll tax," ?
Dang. I wish I could get it.
 
I will be very surprised if my county doesn't go full virtual when school starts. They already delayed to early September and unless the trend suddenly changes over the next week or two, it's not a good trend.

My older cousin's two sons are going to do school in-person after all. I don't think the mom likes the idea, but at least one of their boys apparently wanted to go back.
 
So when is my next covid stimulus check coming? I havnt been keeping up
 
Are they making you make it back though? Alot of people are going to end up owing taxes and be expecting the normal refund.

Most likely.

I wouldn’t forego payroll tax unless you can be certain you will save it incase you have to pay it back. If all Americans who qualified never paid it back it would take a lot of funding from Social Security and Medicare...which will be challenged in the courts. So with all that said I wouldn’t get too excited. I think a deal is struck in Congress and this executive order is removed or challenged in court.
 
Most likely.

I wouldn’t forego payroll tax unless you can be certain you will save it incase you have to pay it back. If all Americans who qualified never paid it back it would take a lot of funding from Social Security and Medicare...which will be challenged in the courts. So with all that said I wouldn’t get too excited. I think a deal is struck in Congress and this executive order is removed or challenged in court.
The whole we need to pay taxes to fund programs issue is a red herring. It matters if you have a fiscally responsible government. But when you're printing up trillions and running trillion+ dollar deficits forevermore, then taxes no longer make sense.
 
So, I guess the debt that we're in is supposed to just continuously roll over until our children and grandchildren are supposed to pay for it? Because that debt is just not going to go in the wind even if we want to wish it into the wind.

That's not that I like taxes as I know I won't when I'm paying. But...
I understand your point GG and in a perfect world raising taxes could help pay down the debt. However, there are several things throughout history which show that it doesn't work that way. Typically tax increases causes new methods of avoiding paying taxes from the rich and just results in a loss of investment in business and creating jobs. Secondly, the supposed increase in revenue from raising taxes is largely negated by the slow down of investment PLUS the fact Democrats have never seen a program they didn't like and have no discipline to curtail spending. To be fair, both parties are complicit in this with the only difference being the Dems tend to do it "bigger and better" when it comes to spending.
So what it all boils down to is raising taxes will cause nothing but an INCREASING national debt, lowering of investment and the merry go round never ceases. You could take every penny of money and assets from the top 1% and it would run the federal government about 2 1/2 months. The money is in the middle to upper middle classes because this is where most Americans are, throw in the fact that the bottom 50% pay 1% of all taxes and you see where it breaks down. Without pain and the fortitude it requires of actually cutting spending, we get nowhere
 
Most likely.

I wouldn’t forego payroll tax unless you can be certain you will save it incase you have to pay it back. If all Americans who qualified never paid it back it would take a lot of funding from Social Security and Medicare...which will be challenged in the courts. So with all that said I wouldn’t get too excited. I think a deal is struck in Congress and this executive order is removed or challenged in court.
So interest free loan that I have no doubt at least 50% of the population will not understand has to be paid back. What could possibly go wrong?
 
The whole we need to pay taxes to fund programs issue is a red herring. It matters if you have a fiscally responsible government. But when you're printing up trillions and running trillion+ dollar deficits forevermore, then taxes no longer make sense.

Yeah but that’s an entirely different conversation. Yes the government is terrible with money, I could see that yesterday. The point is it’s taking funding away...so if the argument is the government can just print more money and replace it then that’s all and good. But typically people who rely on government programs are the ones taking on the burden of defunding realities, not people who can handle it most.

The red herring is the president’s executive orders yesterday.
 
Yeah but that’s an entirely different conversation. Yes the government is terrible with money, I could see that yesterday. The point is it’s taking funding away...so if the argument is the government can just print more money and replace it then that’s all and good. But typically people who rely on government programs are the ones taking on the burden of defunding realities, not people who can handle it most.

The red herring is the president’s executive orders yesterday.
No matter what happens with taxes, none of these programs are going to get defunded until the system finally collapses.

I don't blame Trump for taking EO action. Whether it's a stunt or whatever, at least he's doing something. I mean there are a lot of things to bash him about, but this one is kind of silly to harp on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top