If we can’t get the gulf more involved your best shot at seeing a snow flurry are from the wind blown snow guns on top of Wolf Laurel. We are keeping the blind faith til the bitter endHey Jimmy, How much for me this time? You know I'm going to be the big winner when all is said and done! But seriously though you think it gets this far NW? I'm just hoping for a little snowy period, you know what I mean....
Thank you Jim, that gives me so much hope when I had very little.If we can’t get the gulf more involved your best shot at seeing a snow flurry are from the wind blown snow guns on top of Wolf Laurel. We are keeping the blind faith til the bitter end
Where are you located in Georgia?The Weather Channel now saying 4-8" here on Tuesday.
Its bc hes flip flopping imo.... Makes it seem like hes got a prerogative. The other day he said GFS was correct bc it had dry, and EURO was wrong bc it had the storm. Now hes flipped, thats my opinion anyway looks like hes cherry picking to keep conservativeWe sure are great at trashing models that don't show what we want....meanwhile poor Brad P getting crucified for not hugging the GEM/GFS on twitter.
AmericusWhere are you located in Georgia?
Don't take TWC's weather app seriously.The Weather Channel now saying 4-8" here on Tuesday.
My first wife was redheaded .... If this is what were counting on im scared, she was legit insaneView attachment 164652
No worries, Captain Canada will save our snow!
Way down in south GA. Would be a heck of a storm for y’all to see thatAmericus
I mean, we spend hours day and night looking at probability models of storms we might not even get. Insane is what we need.My first wife was redheaded .... If this is what were counting on im scared, she was legit insane
it has a lot of potential.I'd take 1-2 inches of snow & would be happy in Columbia. But it just feels like this has so much more potential than that.
Carmen San DiegoAmericus
Ditto re: I'll take 1-2 inches, but like yourself, it would feel like wasted potential. This feels it could be so much more than a "novelty event" in our area.I'd take 1-2 inches of snow & would be happy in Columbia. But it just feels like this has so much more potential than that.
He is. He's got a method to the way he does things. His biggest weakness is the public though. He lets them get to him so much. The battle he tries to fight against all the people hyping things up etc is a losing one. He's even got well known mets contradicting what he's saying even in the Carolinas, so it's not like it's some random person on YT or tiktok. But I mean respect to him for trying to fight it lol. It's just a lost cause in my opinion. People are going to believe what they want to believe, and that goes with anything in life.Brad is good. Prob the best around here. I believe he’s good because he can separate what he wants to happen from what is most likely to happen. That’s a tough mental barrier there.
I’m on the north end of central GARight on the border of Central and South GA. The very northern end of South GA.
Imagine how bad it’s gonna look sticking to its guns and being completely wrong.It has been steady as a rock
If this is the one for the coast you just tip your cap and move on. Would be a tough pill to swallow but I think we will do okI'd be concerned if I was in a bullseye but I'd also be 40 more offshore. Feeling pretty good about this one, those N and NW precip expansions in the last 96 hours are delicious
I have a feeling the last half decade or so has really jaded him into being this way. The people who flock to comment sections when a storm busts bad are louder than when the forecast misses in a positive way.Its bc hes flip flopping imo.... Makes it seem like hes got a prerogative. The other day he said GFS was correct bc it had dry, and EURO was wrong bc it had the storm. Now hes flipped, thats my opinion anyway looks like hes cherry picking to keep conservative
Is that Fro twitter account?Goes without saying it’s way north of that already. Congrats Kentucky?
Model | Typical Use Cases | Strengths | Limitations |
---|---|---|---|
ECMWF | Large-scale global forecasting | Most accurate for storm tracks, jet streams, and precipitation. | Computationally intensive, fewer updates. |
GFS | Global, especially North America | High frequency of updates, good global coverage. | Slightly less accurate globally than ECMWF. |
UKMO | Regional (Europe and surrounding) | Detailed regional forecasting, strong in Europe. | Lower resolution globally. |
Canadian GEM | North America, winter storms | Strong in snow/ice forecasts. | Weaker in tropical or large-scale systems. |
Agreed. As long as we don't leave that shortwave behind we will be fine. The same models that were more progressive and SE (icon/ukmo) are the same way again. No 2 storms are the same but models make the same mistakesIf this is the one for the coast you just tip your cap and move on. Would be a tough pill to swallow but I think we will do ok
NahIs that Fro twitter account?