bingcrosbyb
Member
High ceiling environment for these 2 cells.
My bad. I couldn’t think of a better word. Just was curious why he said it wasn’t going to be as bad hereCan we please not call getting less severe weather and tornadoes a “bust”...no rules against and I don’t want to start any kind of argument. Just a pet peeve of mine I guess. I understand the sentiment when the weather doesn’t turn out as models predict. Maybe someone can come up with a more appropriate term considering the potential damage and injuries that would be averted?
Probably because the environment is not nearly as favorable in GA than it was in MSMy bad. I couldn’t think of a better word. Just was curious why he said it wasn’t going to be as bad here
Wonder if he meant the large powerful tornados? We may not get those but even the small quick spin ups can do a lot of damage ??No he didn’t. Just said it wouldn’t be as bad
But why isn't the environment as favorable ? This is an historic severe weather event as FFC has mentioned. I would think the environment would be very favorable for all modes of severe weather.Probably because the environment is not nearly as favorable in GA than it was in MS
I mean I'm nowhere close to an expert, seems to me that the parameters in MS were just plain better for tornadic development.But why isn't the environment as favorable ?
Probably because the environment is not nearly as favorable in GA than it was in MS
As of 755 pm...Strong low level warm advection is steadily
displacing the in-situ cold air damming that developed near the Blue
Ridge earlier today. E.g., the surface temp has warmed a whopping 12
degrees at KGSP in the past three hours. Surface-based instability
remains confined to areas along the I-20 corridor in AL/GA, but will
continue to be drawn northward in response to the very strong warm
air and moisture advection...and as lapse rates increase in response
to very strong forcing. A guidance consensus suggests an axis of
sbCAPE of up to 1000 J/kg will develop into the Upstate and northeast
GA zones by 06Z...just as QLCS is expected to be moving across the
area. Shear parameters will go through the roof after about 03Z as
60-70 kt LLJ translates across the area...supporting outrageous (>
500) values of 0-1 km SRH. Considering the expected degree of
instability, this is looking more like a "QLCS with embedded
supercell structures" type of event, rather than the "low-topped
QLCS with mesovortex" events that we`re used to. That being the
case, the SRH parameters are downright scary, and portend the
potential for a strong/damaging tornado or two. Swaths of downburst
damage also appear likely...if based on nothing else than good old-
fashioned convective mixing.
Speaking of which, gradient winds will also be an issue overnight
and into the daytime period Mon. With the lowering jet core, shallow
mixing will allow stg wind gusts to reach the sfc. With moist soils
these winds could down isol weak or dead trees. A Wind Advisory is
in effect for much of the forecast area.
Rainfall amounts have thus far been relatively tame in the
stratiform/showery upglide/warm front regime that`s been in place
across the area. However, intense rainfall rates within the QLCS
will nevertheless pose a threat for localized flash flooding,
especially across southwest NC and the GA mountains.
Let me ask a serious question: We have a moderate risk area outlined by the SPC. We've had numerous tornado warnings, confirmed strong tornadoes, wind and hail reports, etc. Was/is this a bust? No high risk was issued. Was the SPC calling for some mega/historic outbreak? I mean, we've heard a lot of exceptional language describing this event and the parameters from posts here, but from an official standpoint, has this been a bust? Really?Can we please not call getting less severe weather and tornadoes a “bust”...no rules against and I don’t want to start any kind of argument. Just a pet peeve of mine I guess. I understand the sentiment when the weather doesn’t turn out as models predict. Maybe someone can come up with a more appropriate term considering the potential damage and injuries that would be averted?
First fatality reported in Miss.