HSVweather
Member
Well had we had 0-1km helicity across AL around 300 today, it verifies the High easy. However that can be said for a handful of events over the past years as well. Also it’s not like the helicity here busted low, it was fairly well models.
I still can’t get over the Easter Sunday setup, shear was there but it was so messy, imo that setup had a shot to be close to 2011 vs this one
That setup was disgusting, it had more potential to be more nasty then it wasThe closest thing in my mind to 4/27/11 was the day of the Beauregard tornado. Now that event still would have fell well short, but add a stronger EML and move the system north 200 miles. Oh my.
I feel for the folks at NWS that are responsible for issuing the outlooks and trying to decide what threat level this or any event is. It's really a no win situation for them....Had they went more conservative with their guidance and we had a more severe outbreak we would be criticizing them for not doing enough....same thing goes the other way....a lot of people are now saying how they shouldn't have been so bullish in their approach to today's system. Damned if you do and damned if you don't![]()
Bravo!!! That’s what I was thinking after about 730 last night when things were weakening... I don’t know what all the numbers translate to, but I am learning what they mean! Great explanation!?My thoughts:
1: Round one failed because of meager low level helicity. I’ve seen it many times and this is what happens when 0-1km helicity is 150-200. You have storms spin like a top, with little ground truth unless the storm rides a boundary or it strengthens enough to finally get a tornado down for a short period of time. This was pretty well modeled.
2. I believe round two failed because of unidirectional flow aloft. This lead to messy storm modes which also helped work over the area. Most of the modeled helicity was speed shear not directional shear(the opposite happened over AL)This was also well modeled.
3. Initiation of supercells the occurred earlier and speed of the squall line also helped. The past few days had supercell initiation over central AL at or around 21z to 0z, however supercells were being initiated by 11am this morning. Slow them down and the shear increases some, although I don’t know if it changes the event.
4. The CAMs were throwing out warning after warning with the overall lack of UH streaks over the high risk area. These are never fully accurate and bust often, but when models that absolutely love to nuke the area don’t nuke the area, they may be on to something.
It may have busted in the high risk zone, but man it did not for these folks. This has got to be 4+ right?
View attachment 79732