ATLwxfan
Member
Euro: “You ain’t getting nadaaaaa from us!”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And at least you are saying it in here, job well done grasshopperI love coming in here and seeing I am in for a nice cold rain treat Sunday. Id have it no other way.
Just remember to add “ cold sucks without snow”I'm so tired of all these little snows, I would rather have cold rain. Am I doing it right?
I mean, if you want to get philosophical, we could think along the lines of @GaWx : Technically what's going to happen is going to happen, and the models have no bearing on what will or will not be. So, if it in-fact rains on Sunday, then it was already destined to fail.Seeing the mental gymnastics that some of yall perform to convince yourself that every storm is destined to fail is hilarious.
Buncha great value widremanns.
I kinda miss Widremann doing his anti-weenie act.Seeing the mental gymnastics that some of yall perform to convince yourself that every storm is destined to fail is hilarious.
Buncha great value widremanns.
Agreement from me. We technically torture ourselves when it comes to Wintry weather outside 2 days chasing the models. Tropical, severe, and other types of common weather are much less stressful.I mean, if you want to get philosophical, we could think along the lines of @GaWx : Technically what's going to happen is going to happen, and the models have no bearing on what will or will not be. So, if it in-fact rains on Sunday, then it was already destined to fail.
I mean, if you want to get philosophical, we could think along the lines of @GaWx : Technically what's going to happen is going to happen, and the models have no bearing on what will or will not be. So, if it in-fact rains on Sunday, then it was already destined to fail.
Admittedly, I would prefer the latter. Good for humanity and safety/planning as a whole too.Indeed, essentially the models due to their inability to perfectly model the atmosphere often early on have solutions that look good but turn out to merely be fiction. We wouldn’t have a way to know that these solutions were fiction from the start though we could guess based on biases/their record. Of course, it can go the opposite way, too.
If there were an absolutely perfect model, we’d always know well in advance and there’d be no reason to have forecasting discussions since we’d already know what’s to come. In that way, it would be kind of boring.
Admittedly, I would prefer the latter. Good for humanity and safety/planning as a whole too.
Good point as I couldn’t argue with it being better for safety/planning. But it might not be so good for the meteorological profession as there’d in theory be less need for those who forecast if the machines were to be perfect.
But if the Machines were perfect, then they'd find us flawed...Good point as I couldn’t argue with it being better for safety/planning. But it might not be so good for the meteorological profession as there’d in theory be less need for those who forecast if the machines were to be perfect.
Yo is that dude still around? Talk about a blast from the pastSeeing the mental gymnastics that some of yall perform to convince yourself that every storm is destined to fail is hilarious.
Buncha great value widremanns.