JP152
Member
If there was an 'oof' emoji for your outcome and a 'thumbs up emoji' for the excitement you provide when you post here, you'd get both.Zero snowflakes here. A lovely cold rain, though.
Nice little score SD. Better than my area in CaryCan't believe it was enough to get the ground whiteView attachment 178608
Dang y’all got a sleddable amount in Raleigh?? CongratsGoing to bed but we’ve fallen to 29 and looking out the window snow rate has actually picked up a little again. Going to take the kids sledding in AM, can’t wait. Good start to season
Dang y’all got a sleddable amount in Raleigh?? Congrats
1.75 seems to be final tally. Really hope you get in on the next one!@RBR71 what was your final total?


Yep I just looked and sugar mountain reported 6”. Nice little event up therealright, less of a disaster this time around, but still PLENTY of room for improvement
going to have to split this one up into regions
recap:
-first of all, the high country blew past my expectations. I actually initially had 3-5" (locally 5"+) for pretty much all of watauga/ashe counties, which would have been a solid but still a bit below verification forecast, but i got scared and pushed it back to the border a little more. even eastern watauga managed 4-5". so, i take some consolation in having a pretty good forecast over there initially, but generally missed low for eastern high country (1-3" forecast, 4-5" verificaiton). locally 5"+ certainly verified, and i could have said 6 or 7 + and still been on target. so generally too conservative in the mountains (especially alleghany co, which did very well with 2-4" (where i forecasted a 2" ceiling. oof).
-further south in the mountains, generally more on target. lots of trace/dusting/0.5" reports down there. a bit too conservative for the smokies as well.
-outside the mountains, the most glaring issue i see is too aggressive on a dusting. from what i can tell this morning, that line should have followed the piedmont screw zone i drew in for the 0.5-2" and 1-3" contours MUCH more tightly. so, the southern and western parts of the dusting forecast failed.
-in northern and NE NC, it looks pretty good from what i can tell. i gave myself maybe a little too much of a range with that 0.5-2" zone, but i felt there was some boom potential still there and wanted to cover that some. in fact, there is a 2.0" report from just NW of rocky mount, which would imply 0.5-2 was actually a pretty realistic range for that zone as i am sure several around there only got an inch or so.
- the 1-3" zone looks solid to me. again, i am sure there were a few relative screw zones that fell shy or barely got to 1", but LSRs seem to line up decently well with the higher accumulation forecast zones on this map. even got a 1.1" from elizabeth city to verify the far eastern edge of this forecast
grade (mountains): C-, maybe D+. good in the lower accum zones, but conservative up top
grade (immediate piedmont): C-, too aggressive with the dusting generally, should have cut it north from western caldwell co to winston-salem and then followed I-40 down.
grade (north central/northeastern): A-, i can't find too many glaring issues out there as it stands.
overall grade: C+. mountains drag this one down for me. good out east, but a 3" ceiling turning into a 4-6" event with 6-8" up top is not good enough
View attachment 178635
Last pic I promise but this is my favorite from last night. Christmas lights in the snow are rare around here and really do brighten the spirit!
View attachment 178626
what platform did you use to make this map?alright, less of a disaster this time around, but still PLENTY of room for improvement
going to have to split this one up into regions
recap:
-first of all, the high country blew past my expectations. I actually initially had 3-5" (locally 5"+) for pretty much all of watauga/ashe counties, which would have been a solid but still a bit below verification forecast, but i got scared and pushed it back to the border a little more. even eastern watauga managed 4-5". so, i take some consolation in having a pretty good forecast over there initially, but generally missed low for eastern high country (1-3" forecast, 4-5" verificaiton). locally 5"+ certainly verified, and i could have said 6 or 7 + and still been on target. so generally too conservative in the mountains (especially alleghany co, which did very well with 2-4" (where i forecasted a 2" ceiling. oof).
-further south in the mountains, generally more on target. lots of trace/dusting/0.5" reports down there. a bit too conservative for the smokies as well.
-outside the mountains, the most glaring issue i see is too aggressive on a dusting. from what i can tell this morning, that line should have followed the piedmont screw zone i drew in for the 0.5-2" and 1-3" contours MUCH more tightly. so, the southern and western parts of the dusting forecast failed.
-in northern and NE NC, it looks pretty good from what i can tell. i gave myself maybe a little too much of a range with that 0.5-2" zone, but i felt there was some boom potential still there and wanted to cover that some. in fact, there is a 2.0" report from just NW of rocky mount, which would imply 0.5-2 was actually a pretty realistic range for that zone as i am sure several around there only got an inch or so.
- the 1-3" zone looks solid to me. again, i am sure there were a few relative screw zones that fell shy or barely got to 1", but LSRs seem to line up decently well with the higher accumulation forecast zones on this map. even got a 1.1" from elizabeth city to verify the far eastern edge of this forecast
grade (mountains): C-, maybe D+. good in the lower accum zones, but conservative up top
grade (immediate piedmont): C-, too aggressive with the dusting generally, should have cut it north from western caldwell co to winston-salem and then followed I-40 down.
grade (north central/northeastern): A-, i can't find too many glaring issues out there as it stands.
overall grade: C+. mountains drag this one down for me. good out east, but a 3" ceiling turning into a 4-6" event with 6-8" up top is not good enough
View attachment 178635
qgis and google slidesI’m
what platform did you use to make this map?