Live and die by one model?That is my point. You don’t really get any more clarity in really any direction from previous runs.
Live and die by one model?That is my point. You don’t really get any more clarity in really any direction from previous runs.
You could probably tell by the lack of posts but yeah GEFS sucked
it was underwhelming and i'll leave it at thatFor everybody?
Euro did too…UK also just shifted the 5/7 storm 100 miles south. Model's drunk
Yeah was just looking at the 500mb vort map at 198. They really aren’t very similar. GFS is on topIn fairness, I don’t think the Euro run is the direction that any of us want to go in. It dropped the northern stream down from North Dakota to Tennessee and missed 80-90% of the Baja wave. I know many are interested in solutions that stay cold and south, but that’s not the best way to go about it. Very limited storm threat / precip amount potential in that scenario
Maybe an interesting battle going on at the moment from the formidable duo from yester-year (Euro / UKMet) vs. the new and young AI kids on the block (Euro AI / GFS Graphcast)
We've seen this battle a few times during 2024. 9/10 times, the AI guidance reigns supreme..In fairness, I don’t think the Euro run is the direction that any of us want to go in. It dropped the northern stream down from North Dakota to Tennessee and missed 80-90% of the Baja wave. I know many are interested in solutions that stay cold and south, but that’s not the best way to go about it. Very limited storm threat / precip amount potential in that scenario
Maybe an interesting battle going on at the moment from the formidable duo from yester-year (Euro / UKMet) vs. the new and young AI kids on the block (Euro AI / GFS Graphcast)
For Jackson to Columbia, I think you’d want to see a partial phase with waviness coming on out and running west to east. Or you go with a more phased solution that has improved 50/50 confluence out front that keeps everything from climbing too far northYes. But how would we best accomplish that, without having the crazy amplification and sacrificing the cold? WAA is a big concern, especially after seeing the earlier GFS run.
Kind of glad I went to sleep before the euro lol. Latest graphcast GFS, pretty impressive event for Atlanta-CLT-Columbia (most of that for those areas is snow per 850s and 2mt) near double digit snowfall for those 3 cities View attachment 158932View attachment 158933View attachment 158934
To me (most of the time) it’s a good sign for the south when the snowfall footprint starts in NM/TX
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Seems like we’ve got more warmer the last 3 runs thoughView attachment 158940View attachment 158941View attachment 158942View attachment 158943View attachment 158944View attachment 158945AIFS has less interaction between the Baja ULL/secondary digging vort this run, so not as amped, but still a nice system results
Oh lawd not what I wanted to read this A.M.Yeh this run sucks View attachment 158948
Good. We were amping this thing entirely to fast. Keep it flat & weak then amp it up in the coming days.Yeh this run sucks View attachment 158948
Ugggg it took a page out of the 00Z UKMETS playbook.Need to calm this trend hereView attachment 158947